Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Gavin Newsom takes on economists and the media to claim that residents pay more tax in Texas and Florida.



Photo above - California Governor Newsom photobombs the Yamaha music booth at Austin's SXSW music festival. During his campaign stop there the governor claimed Texans pay more in taxes than people in California.

I would never have predicted this. California Governor Gavin Newsom is launching his 2028 presidential bid . . . by campaigning AGAINST Texas and Florida. Usually, it’s not until the late stages of a campaign that candidates resort to trashing opposition voters as “losers” or “a basket full of deplorables”. Is Newsom writing off sunbelt voters as his first move? (see link below)

Candidate Newsom made his remarks at the SXSW film and music festival in Austin and followed up with Titter/X on full blast. Austin isn't exactly the heart of Texas, but still.

Newsom of course has a bachelors degree in Poli Sci and no credentials in economics or tax policy. Probably the people writing his campaign speeches don’t either. Hiis state budget problems and economic record as governor of California speaks for themselves.

In the opposite corner, there's an analysis by the nonprofit organization "Just the Facts". I hadn’t heard of this outfit, so I googled them. Frequently cited by major media, including PBS, CBS, Yahoo and Fox. But that’s no proof that Just the Facts is right. Those media outlets have their own checkered history with the truth.

Just the Facts conducted an analysis the actual tax burden. It turns the average person in California pays $10,000 a year, and in Texas it’s $5,000 a year. JTF theorizes that Newsom’s views arise from a distorted perception of middle-class incomes and spending through the lens of California career politicians.

It is well documented that income taxes and property taxes are lower almost everywhere than in California. Here in Florida we do have a painful sales tax. And it’s “regressive” - everyone pays the same rate on the stuff they buy at the store. But is taxing consumption actually worse than taxing someone's paycheck and bedroom? Anyway, I’m a renter, and I pay sales tax, gas tax, and a hotel tax if I ever go to one. If and when I buy a home, the property tax will be 1% of its assessed value, and I’m not expecting to win the lottery and score a half million-dollar home with a $5,000 tax bill.

In another forum someone is convinced that Kamala Harris is the 2028 democrat front runner. I doubt that. Newsom is dominating the media, and his campaign just attracted 100,000 new contributors who are incensed by ICE tactics and the war against Iran. I don’t know what Kamala is giving speeches about, but the media evidently isn’t covering it.

Irrespective of anyone’s feeling about local income and property taxes, those are NOT presidential campaign issues. The president is NOT going to issue an executive order raising or lowering your local taxes. That’s what state elections and officials are for. The US president DOES have the ability to address ongoing federal spending (military, entitlements) and one-offs like Covid 19 stimulus handouts or soybean price supports.

So far every president in recent memory has flubbed economics. Our national debt is over $38 trillion, and it’s increasing by $250 million an hour, night and day. We already pay $1 trillion a year in interest, and this seems likely to zoom up as the federal reserve is poised to raise rates again. The last president to achieve a balanced budget was Bill Clinton, thanks to a soaring dot-com stock market.

Mr. Newsom – and the eventual republican candidate to be named later: if you want to launch a tax debate, stop putting state and local taxes under a magnifying glass. The problem is in Washington DC. Let’s not dodge this, like happened in 2024, 2020, 2016 . . .

I’m just sayin’ . . .



Newsom's claim Texas and Florida are the 'real high tax states' picked apart by expert: 'Fatally flawed'

United States Debt Clock March 2026


https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/newsom-s-claim-texas-and-florida-are-the-real-high-tax-states-picked-apart-by-expert-fatally-flawed/ar-AA1ZatQm?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=69c1050d293f4e8fa1c6879d131a1c96&ei=62
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
jackson55 · M
Newsome and company have managed to run several big companies out of California because of taxes and regulations.
The most recient are Yamaha who’s been there for 50 years. And the most valuable company in the world, Apple, is heading for Texas.
@jackson55 Funny thing: when Elon tried to take Tesla to Texas, the engineering division remained in California. I suspect other companies will have the same difficulty convincing their knowledge workers to leave. Seems there's a surprising number of people who won't move from a pro-choice state to an anti-choice state.

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb 22 (Reuters) - Elon Musk is not entirely abandoning California, saying on Wednesday that Tesla Inc (TSLA.O), will make the state its global engineering home, even though the electric vehicle maker's corporate headquarters are now in Texas.
https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-set-make-announcement-california-engineering-headquarters-2023-02-22/

And, regarding Apple, I think you'll find they remain based in their HQ in Cupertino CA, while spinning up some manufacturing near Houston TX