Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I didn't even know Ben Affleck HAD an AI company. Now Netflix is buying it for $600 million.



Photo above - Pirates of the Caribbean, now a Disney+ franchise. Are we circling the drain when it comes to streaming and subscription costs? Where does it end?

Congrats to Netflix on buying an AI cinema effects company nobody ever heard of before, for nearly a billion dollars (see link below. But there's already too much CGI low quality film franchises where the screenwriters seem to have left the building ages ago.

This is a story which could go either way. I could rant about there being too many marginal AI players to eke out a living and survive the coming shakeout. Or I can point out that there is a limit to the number of streaming subscriptions anyone can afford, and the amount hours in a day to enjoy those show. Let’s focus on how much my entertainment monthly charges are.

Netflix – yes I have this one. $24.99 a month. To get 4K film (when available) and watch on more than one screen. This is March 2026 pricing. Netflix has raised prices annually, amounting to 40% of the past few years. This is no doubt helping to fatten Ben Affleck’s wallet.

YouTube – too many plans to list, even if I had all day. If you go for the top plan, it could cost up to $82 a month. If I cancel Xfinity/comcast subscription then I’d still need comcast Wi-Fi ($50 a month), a price which will surely continue to inflate. If I want “good” comcast Wi-Fi, with better speeds and reliability, it’s gonna cost more.

Xfinity TV package – I’m paying over $100 a month for 2 sets. I have a bunch of things bundled into this, including HBO max, would are available as standalone. Or maybe they are already standalone for me? I can hardly tell. I get several emails/texts a week telling me the apologize for tiling and disruption, and inviting me to upgrade to a faster/more expensive modem. Consumer alert - HBO Max removed "Westworld" from it's on demand streaming. You have to pay per episode, even though it was an HBO show when originally broadcast.

Paramount + - $8.99 a month on my plan. $13.99 if I go ad free. I got this to watch “Star Trek - Strange New Worlds". I think . . . )

Apple TV - $12.99 a month. This is the only way to get Ted Lasso and any of the soccer matches in Europe. I've started watching "Severence". It's very good. But not $156 a year worth of "good".

I believe I also may have Disney +, but I haven’t stumbled into any House of Mouse content recently. Disney owns the entire Star Wars, Marvel Cinematic Universe, Pirates of the Caribbean, and Indiana Jones franchises. Does this mean i can only watch re-runs at Disney+ now?

Here are subscriptions I’m pretty sure I have NOT been snared into yet: Hulu, Sling, Fubo, Philo, separate ESPN (I get at least 2 ESPN channels on Xfinity, so I assume it’s bundled); I don’t have a dedicated NFL streaming package. And I don’t have “new” Direct TV, where the dish is gone and they stream their content to my Xfinity modem.

So far I’m up to around $300 a month. Before I factor in my AT&T wireless plan. That’s costing me $50 a month, even with a paid off phone. And I can’t cut my cellular service, even though I NEVER watch TV on my phone, or my tablet.

So – I’m spending $350 a month to watch tv, receive zillions of spam emails, and occasionally make a phone call. And those dozen services get more complex all the time.

Maybe this is the reason many of us have no cash left at the end of the month. It’s all going to wireless entertainment. I don’t have enough free hours in the day to justify all this expense.

I’m just sayin’ . . .



Netflix to pay up to $600 million for Ben Affleck's AI company

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/netflix-to-pay-up-to-600-million-for-ben-affleck-s-ai-company/ar-AA1Yq70g?ocid=msedgntphdr&cvid=69b29ac406fe4b86b78e593fab47cf9b&cvpid=69b29bdce9b64e7cb78ddff144ce2eb6&ei=68
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ArishMell · 70-79, M
I fear the eventual result, though perhaps not for some years yet, will be the entire US entertainments industry concentrated in just two or three major companies based on endless repeats of existing films, formulaic "new" ones with high digital contents to set menus, and on suppressing originality, individuality and ultimately, for the viewer, suppressing choice.
Likely you won’t be around to see that if it occurs. The American consumer currently demands more and will always demand more especially as time wasting contentless apps continue to disappear. Take the drivel on this one for example. @ArishMell
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@jackjjackson Well, if you don't like SW you don't have to use it, but demanding more and more of what, in your view? By volume or quality? Variety or uniformity?
Quality and variety @ArishMell
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@jackjjackson Well, we can hope so, but I worry the bigger and more faceless the corporation the less interested it will be in the commercial risk of creating anything very original and individual.

It will more likely want only quick returns from low-budget, formulaic works.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@ArishMell there will always be openings for new players, with better writers, and imaginative videography.

the USA is already throwing off the shackles of the brain dead MCU
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@SusanInFlorida Well, I hope so. It depends how much freedom is allowed by the accountants.
Consumers add, cancel, switch streaming services at the drop of a hat. A bad product will cause a mass exodus and no monthly fees being paid. @ArishMell
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@jackjjackson Fine while plenty of choice still exists. It's the loss of such choice, mainly by mergers and take-overs, that I fear.
For decades people watched three broadcast networks. I understand your concern. Suppose you’re right and it’s consolidated into two streaming services. If there is nothing worthwhile on them people will go to the internet instead and the ensuing bankruptcies will be huge. @ArishMell
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@jackjjackson Indeed - and with the bankruptcies a huge number of redundancies inclusing of very skilled, creative people.
Those people go back to production of real live content. @ArishMell
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@jackjjackson That would be good. A reaction to AI and CGI perhaps?
Of course. That product currently sucks. @ArishMell