Boy you know you fkked up as president when Iran basically elected a new leader just because he pisses off America.

@MrSmooTh Do a little research on the effects of bombing a civilian population on the resolve of the people. Maybe the London Blitz would be a good place to start..😷

@MrSmooTh Hmmm maybe violence forces people to act right, maybe not. You could be right. We'll see if bombing them changes their minds and makes them see the ways of democracy.

@SatanBurger In my experience violence has a cool way of creating peace. Kind of like the bully that tries to take your lunch money. Does talking with them make them leave you alone? No. But punching them in the face sure does. People need to grow a backbone. Those people don't want to negotiate, they just want to kill us. So we need to kill them first.

@MrSmooTh Countries aren’t like one bully and one kid on a playground. When violence happens between countries, it often creates cycles of retaliation rather than ending the conflict. For example, analysts often warn that attacking Iran could trigger regional war, missile strikes, proxy attacks, and economic disruption like shutting the Strait of Hormuz. So instead of ending the threat, violence can expand it.

Also, there is news confirming that the bomb that hit that one school as a US tomahawk. Now I don't really know these allegations but suppose this was true, you can't say that those Iranian school girls were your bully.

If violence worked on a mass scale, when the death penalty was more common, we would see a common decrease in violent criminals. Just like when they hanged people wasn't a deterrent. This is a common justification but in areas where they've gone different from the United States in crime, they've seen a sharp decrease. So if violence on violence was always true, the previous facts would have happened by now in the US, more violence would equal sharp decrease in crime, but it's not true.

@SatanBurger The americans murdered around 130 children because the targeting information hadn't been updated for over ten years!
That's on hegseth - the juvenile war gamer.
As always the cowardly commander-in-chief of america's armed forces ran away from his responsibilities.
When asked for comment, he said "I don't know about it".

@MrSmooTh Actually, you have a point. After all, the Americans are the only people ever to use Nuclear weapons in anger..What could possibly go wrong?😷

@newjaninev2 As SuperPresident, isnt Trump the guy who knows everything about everything? Wasnt his uncle a Custodian at MIT or something?😷

@MrSmooTh
Since we say that we are going to kill them first maybe they should kill us first for their own protection.

@Diotrephes They can try.

@whowasthatmaskedman So your argument for not bombing a country that wants to kill us and destroy our way of life is that we're all going to die one day anyway. Dumb.

@MrSmooTh I just think its a little rich to take that attitude, when your country has spent almost 50 years getting the other country to hate you, including bombing and assassinations as well as visiting deprivation on the people though economic sanctions. But I suspect you are soon to learn a little of what its like to be on the other end of that..😷

@MrSmooTh The US has a $10million bounty on Iran's leader. Maybe they should follow the orange traitor's example and put some huge bounties on American politicians. Then, a lot of new millionaires can be created, which could help the economy.🤔

@Diotrephes Just as a helpful suggestion. Maybe post the bounty in gold, or Euros..Something a little more stable than the $US..😷

@whowasthatmaskedman That's what happens when Americans think that they can do whatever they want. Previous Presidents have posted bounties on foreign leaders and have gotten away with it. So, it's only natural if those leaders start posting big bounties on American leaders. Everything becomes a gang war.