This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Jackaloftheazuresand · 31-35, M
perceived enemies? Then love me as I beat you to death, see how well your plan works. If you aren't willing to kill people who are willing to kill you then you and everyone you know will be killed and your ideals along with you. Your pride for being virtuous only keeps you clean by sacrificing others that you could have saved.
1-25 of 31
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand There's a massive difference between defense and attack.
You would cross a whole town to attack someone in their home and call it defense?
There's something morally wrong with that scenario. It's why we have laws against it.
The ends never justifies the means either. Yes defend. Never attack.
You would cross a whole town to attack someone in their home and call it defense?
There's something morally wrong with that scenario. It's why we have laws against it.
The ends never justifies the means either. Yes defend. Never attack.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 31-35, M
@DeWayfarer No there isn't, somebody still loses
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand Never in defense. And we really haven't even tried to defend ourselves.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 31-35, M
@DeWayfarer Never... dumb
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand I mean morally never.
Attacking as a defense is not a defense. It's unethical.
Attacking as a defense is not a defense. It's unethical.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 31-35, M
@DeWayfarer No you mean "I never own up to my part"
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand Then have some ethics. Own up to it. Defend the USA. Not attack someone else.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 31-35, M
@DeWayfarer Learn English. I'm talking about you old fool.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand No, you are talking about yourself. And not even realizing it. Even your insult is a clue
Jackaloftheazuresand · 31-35, M
@DeWayfarer You said defense never morally causes someone to lose. That is false
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand And you attack with an insult for not wanting to understand.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand Attacking is unethical!
More attacks.
BTW your reply was hidden. Even the algorithm is saying it's wrong.
More attacks.
BTW your reply was hidden. Even the algorithm is saying it's wrong.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand The algorithm is backing me up more frequently.
I have yet to say anything about you personally.
I have yet to say anything about you personally.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 31-35, M
@DeWayfarer Is that why every other post of yours is edited to change the meaning?
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand I make no claims to being perfect either. Yeah I correct my spelling mistakes. I have admitted to it often.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 31-35, M
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand So what?
You were attacking and refuse to show it? Why? It really doesn't matter it's still an attack...
You were attacking and refuse to show it? Why? It really doesn't matter it's still an attack...
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand Well the third time is the charm!
It only proves my point. The warning is on you solely.
It only proves my point. The warning is on you solely.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 31-35, M
@DeWayfarer Sure buddy. Try cussing then view it from a different account and you'll see why they got censored
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand I rarely ever need to use profanity or even need a second account. I can see those block me even without a second account.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 31-35, M
@DeWayfarer You need the second account because the person with the restriction message can't ssee it from their side. SW doesn't let you know about these things
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Jackaloftheazuresand Profanity only says it's not worth listening to. The context is what matters the most.
1-25 of 31











