This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
You actually believe what that guy on the YouTube clip is saying?
The director of ice does not have to show up in court to prove himself innocent of contempt.
Absolutely nothing will happen to the director of ice if he does not show up in court.
The director of ice does not have to show up in court to prove himself innocent of contempt.
Absolutely nothing will happen to the director of ice if he does not show up in court.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@JohnnySpot I'm sure this response is more in part due to how you personally see it as I noticed a common theme with maga being that the courts don't have power and you can do whatever you want, above everyone else.
It's false though and I asked ai to disprove my claim directly, it said:
That claim is already being disproved in real time: a federal judge has ordered the acting ICE director to show up in court and threatened him with contempt for ignoring court orders in immigration cases.
What actually can happen:
Federal judges can order agency heads, including the ICE director, to personally appear and explain noncompliance with court orders, which is exactly what Judge Patrick Schiltz just did in Minnesota.
The judge explicitly warned the acting ICE director that he may be held in contempt of court because ICE has violated “dozens” of detention‑related orders, causing prolonged and unlawful detention of immigrants.
Contempt is real: if a judge makes that finding, the court can impose sanctions on the agency and, in extreme cases, on responsible officials until they comply.
It's false though and I asked ai to disprove my claim directly, it said:
That claim is already being disproved in real time: a federal judge has ordered the acting ICE director to show up in court and threatened him with contempt for ignoring court orders in immigration cases.
What actually can happen:
Federal judges can order agency heads, including the ICE director, to personally appear and explain noncompliance with court orders, which is exactly what Judge Patrick Schiltz just did in Minnesota.
The judge explicitly warned the acting ICE director that he may be held in contempt of court because ICE has violated “dozens” of detention‑related orders, causing prolonged and unlawful detention of immigrants.
Contempt is real: if a judge makes that finding, the court can impose sanctions on the agency and, in extreme cases, on responsible officials until they comply.
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@SatanBurger I'd like to recommend Hannibal is Hungry on You Tube he gives you the straight story without any political bias.


