This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Bumbles · 56-60, M
Keeping at F 35 in the air is what, like $100,000 an hour? Ha!
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Bumbles Yep. And even Poland put their F16s in secondary service and went back to their Mig 29s because they could not afford the maintenance of the F16. Based on that it is matter of time before the F35 fleet is grounded and they fall back on their FA 50s from South Korea.
If they could not afford to maintain the F16 there is no way they will be able to afford the F35 long term.
If they could not afford to maintain the F16 there is no way they will be able to afford the F35 long term.
Bumbles · 56-60, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Seriously…those new F 15 Eagle 2s are pretty cool, though. And I’m surprised F 16s are that expensive to maintain as they only have one engine.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@Bumbles Yeah. Apparently the F16 is only an "affordable" jet if you have economies of scale. They are a money sink for smaller countries.
I expect the F35 will be 10 times worse.
I expect the F35 will be 10 times worse.



