JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
Did you watch Mark Carney's speech?
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@JimboSaturn No, but I read (and posted above) the article which has the same content. On this, he is exactly right.
LegendofPeza · 61-69, M
@JimboSaturn I did , and it was excellent. That's the blueprint right there.
Persephonee · 26-30, F
I think your last paragraph might be among the most important, not for tl;dr reasons (!) but because it recognises that the "rules" were never really there at all. It was convenient for America to uphold them (some of the time) - and ignore them when not. And the rest of us in the western world bought into the idea of a rules based order because we got to make all the rules.
Trump is unmitigatedly appalling but aside from everything he very definitely didn't do courtesy of his nice friend Jeffrey, I sometimes wonder whether his worst crime isn't just finally saying all the quiet parts out loud. All that's really different is making an attempt at a naked land grab directly rather than doing it by proxies.
Either way, maybe we all ought to go do confession just in case lol
Trump is unmitigatedly appalling but aside from everything he very definitely didn't do courtesy of his nice friend Jeffrey, I sometimes wonder whether his worst crime isn't just finally saying all the quiet parts out loud. All that's really different is making an attempt at a naked land grab directly rather than doing it by proxies.
Either way, maybe we all ought to go do confession just in case lol
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Persephonee Given my age and my politics, it probably wouldn't surprise you to learn that I was on demonstrations against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. American-led war crimes that our own government was complicit in.
Also, when we were a world superpower in the 18th and 19th centuries, we were absolutely a colonialist bully. The annexation of India (as one example) was a far worse crime than anything Trump has done.
Having said all this, I do think that what is happening now is a profound change. Trump does say the quiet bit our loud, but what he is doing is even worse.
Also, when we were a world superpower in the 18th and 19th centuries, we were absolutely a colonialist bully. The annexation of India (as one example) was a far worse crime than anything Trump has done.
Having said all this, I do think that what is happening now is a profound change. Trump does say the quiet bit our loud, but what he is doing is even worse.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@BabyLonia I agree. Over a longer period of time, we probably killed more people, and we definitely enslaved more: Both literally and figuratively.
Hitler derived inspiration from his own genocidal racism and also from two other nations: Britain and America. Britain's colonial expansion is something he envied, and he saw parallels with his attempted conquest of the USSR and the subjugation of native Americans.
Hitler derived inspiration from his own genocidal racism and also from two other nations: Britain and America. Britain's colonial expansion is something he envied, and he saw parallels with his attempted conquest of the USSR and the subjugation of native Americans.
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
Mark Carney's speech was genuinely extraordinary and I think is gonna be studied by polisci and economics students forever. Davos was the announcement of the end of neoliberalism and the replacement with whatever we'll call the next thing which will involve a lot of the energies of neoliberalism but notably - without a lot of the liberalism. Further entrenched alliances between groups that aren't all constitutional democracies and a move towards militarism over economic soft power. It's gonna kinda be closer to a pre-war arrangement but with the hyper insanity of modern capitalism.
And frankly much much more volatile.
And frankly much much more volatile.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@CountScrofula In a sense, neoliberalism has already ended in the last two decades with hyper-financialization, cloud capitalism and monopoly takeover ending the pretence of the free-market. This isn;t open competition for goods and services.
Though you are completely right. European nations are arguably sliding towards Trumpist authoritarianism anyway. Sometimes from far-right parties and sometimes from centrist adaptation. See Starmer's authoritarian policies on policing and data as classic examples.
The potential resistance of surviving liberalism needs to make the European far-right own everything that Trumps American is doing and call out the brazen hypocrisy. It might well not be enough but it is something. ~
The left (with the arguable exception of France) is not in any position to replace the existing liberal framework with something better. I have to agree with Yanis Varoufakis on that. If we have any hope of winning, we need time.
Though you are completely right. European nations are arguably sliding towards Trumpist authoritarianism anyway. Sometimes from far-right parties and sometimes from centrist adaptation. See Starmer's authoritarian policies on policing and data as classic examples.
The potential resistance of surviving liberalism needs to make the European far-right own everything that Trumps American is doing and call out the brazen hypocrisy. It might well not be enough but it is something. ~
The left (with the arguable exception of France) is not in any position to replace the existing liberal framework with something better. I have to agree with Yanis Varoufakis on that. If we have any hope of winning, we need time.
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
@Burnley123 Right. And Carney, although very much being a Liberal is extremely high-handed and authoritarian within the rules. There is nothing gentle about his behaviour he just knows how much power the Prime Minister has and is using it with great purpose. He's probably going to be remembered as one of the great PMs (not by me lol) although the human cost for his project will likely be significant because there's no kindness in this as the welfare state gets carved off and put into Arctic sovereignty, more resource extraction, and trade with China. This is a Project and he is very very sure of it.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Miram · 31-35, F
There were never international rules.
Europe would be confronting barely a fraction of the violence, dispossession, and instability it continues to normalize and benefit from elsewhere.
I don't see this as a new problem. I see it as retribution in slow motion.
Europe would be confronting barely a fraction of the violence, dispossession, and instability it continues to normalize and benefit from elsewhere.
I don't see this as a new problem. I see it as retribution in slow motion.
Miram · 31-35, F
@Burnley123
You speak about the actions of Europe in the past tense.
It is the present.
I support the natives of Greenland.
I don't support the narrative that Europeans, espacially the European union as an entity are fighting against colonialism.
You speak about the actions of Europe in the past tense.
It is the present.
I support the natives of Greenland.
I don't support the narrative that Europeans, espacially the European union as an entity are fighting against colonialism.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Miram Well, the Greenland people themselves have said clearly that given the choice, they side with Denmark.
I do support their actual independence, btw
I do support their actual independence, btw
Miram · 31-35, F
@Burnley123
That is a preference under constraint, and it isn’t really what I was getting at.
Once colonialism is acknowledged in the present tense in its current forms, European resistance looks less like prîncipled opposition and more like anxiety over losing exclusive control of a system it never truly abandoned.
Should Europe oppose Trump? Of course. A U.S. running amok does not help regions where Europe itself continues to run amok.
Yet that argument is strategic devoid of morality and strategy without moral clarity doesn’t meet all standards being claimed here. And it will often run to the same problems. You cannot build "order" with strategy alone. The rest of the world is very much so disillusioned that they see a war between western powers as an opportunity to be spared of the attention for a good while. Whether they are right or wrong, it is also a byproduct of strategy without ethics.
That is a preference under constraint, and it isn’t really what I was getting at.
Once colonialism is acknowledged in the present tense in its current forms, European resistance looks less like prîncipled opposition and more like anxiety over losing exclusive control of a system it never truly abandoned.
Should Europe oppose Trump? Of course. A U.S. running amok does not help regions where Europe itself continues to run amok.
Yet that argument is strategic devoid of morality and strategy without moral clarity doesn’t meet all standards being claimed here. And it will often run to the same problems. You cannot build "order" with strategy alone. The rest of the world is very much so disillusioned that they see a war between western powers as an opportunity to be spared of the attention for a good while. Whether they are right or wrong, it is also a byproduct of strategy without ethics.
BabyLonia · F
I am worried about the extremes Trump will go to and how he has no-one to answer to
Charity · 70-79
Let's hope there is not another trump-style elected / other nations may be waiting for it.
Then let's hope Trump doesn't find a way to cease elections / other nations may be preparing for it.
Then let's hope Trump doesn't find a way to cease elections / other nations may be preparing for it.
bookerdana · M
88% of the United States are against invasion ,about 60 % against buying Greenland
Elessar · 31-35, M
@bookerdana 88% would mean that even MAGA is split. 60% means that pretty much every republican is open to buying it. The latter isn't a good figure
bookerdana · M
Elessar · 31-35, M
@bookerdana Yeah, but give Fox News, X. etc enough time and that 88% will reach that other 60%. They always fall in line
val70 · 51-55
You think that Mark Carney could be Godzilla?
val70 · 51-55
@JimboSaturn Simple. We've started a new era, a time of monsters. Godzilla is a monster, but it helps humankind to survive nevertheless
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@val70 Well I think the monsters are the hegemons, the super powers, not the middle powers like Canada. I think Carney's point is that smaller nations should stick together to weather the whims of the big countries.
val70 · 51-55
@JimboSaturn He's someone who stands up to Trump. In his eyes he's not weak even if Canada is just middle size. I'm afraid that the thinking these days needs to be almost reversed. It's the words from The Godfather with the characters of a Japanese monster movie. The Belgian Prime Minister is right about the choice given by Trump: happy vassal or miserable slave. We need all to stand up to him like Carney does. I'd just sell every little US stock, dollar or money order. One sudden action that will sink his boat. But that's again monsterous indeed














