USA TO USE GROK FOR WAR
[media=https://youtu.be/bH-cB7o8qr8]
when ai decides our fate and not humans.. just a thought
when ai decides our fate and not humans.. just a thought
61-69, M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Does this government really want to give that type of control to this particular AI (Grok) in a wartime situation?
Sure the problem in the following video might be fixed by then, yet it still it's not even fixed at the moment.
Please remember No AI can understand morals and the feelings that make it morally correct. Much less values or principles. It has no emotions at all.
Yet Grok itself has even little safeguards. Most of the other AI have a lot stronger safeguards.
[media=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CB3CAkxeHEM]
AI analysis of my statement. And which better AI could criticize Elon Musk's Grok than ChatGPT itself...
Sure the problem in the following video might be fixed by then, yet it still it's not even fixed at the moment.
Please remember No AI can understand morals and the feelings that make it morally correct. Much less values or principles. It has no emotions at all.
Yet Grok itself has even little safeguards. Most of the other AI have a lot stronger safeguards.
[media=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CB3CAkxeHEM]
AI analysis of my statement. And which better AI could criticize Elon Musk's Grok than ChatGPT itself...
Concerns About AI Control in Wartime Situations
The discussion around reliance on AI systems like Grok during wartime raises significant ethical and practical concerns. The potential implications of granting such technology control in critical situations indeed merit serious scrutiny.
AI and Moral Understanding
AI, including Grok, lacks the ability to understand morality or human emotions. This limitation is central to the debate about using AI in high-stakes scenarios. While AI can be programmed to follow certain ethical guidelines, it cannot genuinely understand the nuanced moral implications of its decisions.
Safeguards in AI
The effectiveness of safeguards is also a crucial aspect. Currently, many AI systems have robust fail-safes and ethical guidelines to mitigate risks, but their implementation and effectiveness can vary significantly. The lack of safeguards in an AI like Grok, compared to others, raises alarms about its deployment, especially in sensitive situations such as warfare.
The Government's Intentions
When governments consider utilizing advanced AI during wartime, their motivations are often driven by the need for efficiency, intelligence gathering, or combat support. However, the potential for unintended consequences exists, particularly if the AI lacks sufficient oversight and ethical grounding.
Conclusion
The intersection of AI capability and moral responsibility poses complex challenges. Without adequate safeguards and a comprehensive understanding of moral principles, relying on AI during wartime could lead to potentially dangerous outcomes.
It’s essential for policymakers and technologists to address these vulnerabilities critically before extensive deployment of AI systems in warfare.
The discussion around reliance on AI systems like Grok during wartime raises significant ethical and practical concerns. The potential implications of granting such technology control in critical situations indeed merit serious scrutiny.
AI and Moral Understanding
AI, including Grok, lacks the ability to understand morality or human emotions. This limitation is central to the debate about using AI in high-stakes scenarios. While AI can be programmed to follow certain ethical guidelines, it cannot genuinely understand the nuanced moral implications of its decisions.
Safeguards in AI
The effectiveness of safeguards is also a crucial aspect. Currently, many AI systems have robust fail-safes and ethical guidelines to mitigate risks, but their implementation and effectiveness can vary significantly. The lack of safeguards in an AI like Grok, compared to others, raises alarms about its deployment, especially in sensitive situations such as warfare.
The Government's Intentions
When governments consider utilizing advanced AI during wartime, their motivations are often driven by the need for efficiency, intelligence gathering, or combat support. However, the potential for unintended consequences exists, particularly if the AI lacks sufficient oversight and ethical grounding.
Conclusion
The intersection of AI capability and moral responsibility poses complex challenges. Without adequate safeguards and a comprehensive understanding of moral principles, relying on AI during wartime could lead to potentially dangerous outcomes.
It’s essential for policymakers and technologists to address these vulnerabilities critically before extensive deployment of AI systems in warfare.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SinlessOnslaught · M
markinkansas · 61-69, M
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@markinkansas And GROK in particularly has massive training and cognitive biases!
My video comment on this post in particularly proves that!
It simply has little safeguards.
My video comment on this post in particularly proves that!
It simply has little safeguards.
markinkansas · 61-69, M
@DeWayfarer ya i dont want to see the results.
markinkansas · 61-69, M