Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The wealthiest 0.001% of people control 3X more wealth than the bottom 50%. But there’s a catch . . .



Photo above - Al Jazeera, the middle east's pre-eminent news organization, has take the USA to task over "wealth inequality." (This photo may be an AI fake, I can't tell . . . )

Any way you look at it, the optics are bad. The top 10% of earthlings own 75% of homes, bank accounts, Teslas, etc. The average wealth of “north americans” (including you, Canada) is 340% greater than the rest of the people. See link below.

Upon reflection, this doesn’t look like a problem which higher Federal income tax rates can solve. That extra tax money is simply going to remain in America. A little will be shaved off the top by Congress and various agencies, and the rest redistributed (or spent on) deserving North Americans. That money will NOT be leaving the USA to help “the rest of the world”, like Somalia, Bangladesh, Uzbekistan, or Mongolia.

Wait . . . it gets weirder. North American INCOME (paychecks) is already 300% higher than the rest of the world. We’re at the top for both savings and paychecks. How do we feel about redistributing it among ourselves now?

The Al Jazeera article doesn’t do a deep dive on things like car ownership, smartphones, and Roomba vacuums but I take on faith that we’re outperforming Mongolia on those metrics too.

I don’t want to seem churlish, but NONE of the American politicians screaming wealth inequality have any intention of helping out peanut farmers, goat herders, and subsistence fishermen in Africa. They want to redistribute our tax dollars in ways that swell the entitlement class and create loyal voters on election day. When we redistribute 300-340% among ourselves, the size of the pie doesn’t change. The only thing that happens is that somebody’s slice gets a little bigger of what is already the worlds largest pie..

This is why we have uncontrolled migration to America and Europe. Nobody aspires to be a peanut farmer or subsistence fisherman. They want iPhones, Netflix, and BMWs. Even complete regime change in the most despotic nations isn’t going to immediately usher in a golden age of prosperity and equality. Planet earth hasn’t had equality of living standards since the time of the Neanderthals. The first guy who chiseled a rock into a wheel was probably the first millionaire.

I don’t have an answer to fix the problem of global poverty. But I don’t think it will be increasing the top personal income tax rate by another 5%, or to keep expanding the national debt.

I’m just sayin’ . . .



Where in the world are wealth and income most unequal? | Business and Economy News | Al Jazeera
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Translation oligarchs are fine as long as they are American and yet another justification for tax evasion by said oligarchs.


And you have invented an entire strawman argument to justify it. Literally no one is arguing for fairer taxes and less income inequality is doing this out of some concern for people on another continent. That doesn't even make sense as an argument. Nobody has ever claimed this is a solution to global poverty until you made it up just now.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow read it again. i never said the article presented itself as a "solution to global poverty". I'm simply taking on Al Jazeera for claiming that US wages and savings are a problem for africa.
@SusanInFlorida Regardless of the origins of the idea it is still a fake argument no one is actually claiming.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow this is a report which has been published since 2018. it wasn't dreamed up overnight. it's embraced by leftists the world over, who hope to garner a bigger slice of the pie for themselves. instead of making a larger pie
22Michelle · 70-79, T
@SusanInFlorida It's the standard "Whataboutery" argument to divert attention away from those actually causing the problems in the country you could try and do something about.