Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

If Democrats Win the Trifecta in 2028, They MUST End the Filibuster Rule in the Senate and Increase the Size of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Whether it be Roe or birthright citizenship or illegal ICE detentions or assaulting members of Congress or disappearing American citizens to Central American gulags, fascism can't just be stopped with a new executive branch if the Courts allow prior decisions to stand. And a Contitutional amendment process will take too long.

Increasing the size of the U.S. Supreme Court to 15 is the swiftest way to insure that rollbacks of draconian Trump administration executive orders and decisions by his hand-picked justices will be overturned.

Democrats should:

1. Swiftly end the filibuster in the Senate and then IMMEDIATELY move to increase the size of the U.S. Supreme Court to 15 justices with confirmation hearings and votes on nominees by the new president before the end of 2029.

2. End mid-decade gerrymandering with a Constitutional amendment so that redistricting so that district lines drawn up after the 2040 census and 2040 general election won't be tampered with (2040 so that a presidential election year will draw a huge electorate that will also decide legislative elections). Prohibit any redrawing of political districts at a U.S. House or state legislative level from "targetting" an incumbent by putting their principle residence outside of their current district lines.

3. Enact grand jury reform laws so that overzealous prosecutors can no longer recommend the same indictments against a defendant with a new grand jury after a previous grand jury rejects that indictment.

4. Allow U.S. citizens and legal residents to sue the federal government for violations of their Constitutional rights.

5. Increase the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour, retroactive to January 2025 with tax credits issued to those hourly workers during the period between January 2025 and the time the legislation is enacted who otherwise would have earned the extra hourly wage. Additional, the federal government should add to the Social Security Trust Fund the equivalent of 12% of the total tax credit issued and crediting those workers with the extra income to qualify for higher benefits when they collect Social Security. The miniumum wage set once the legislation goes into effect shall be $15 per hour and adjusted for inflation since January 2025. Furthermore, it shall be automatically adjusted for inflation or indexed to increase with Congressional salaries (which ever is higher) without any sunset provision. The sub-minimum wage shall also be eliminated.

TBC
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
They'd have done those things if they wanted. After they win it's not important to do anything.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Roundandroundwego

Not with Sinema and Manchin blocking the path.
@beckyromero it's not like we'd hold Dems accountable for the failure! You did Your best! That's all we can ask. Failure was your best. And there'd never be a leftist alternative! Never!!!!
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Roundandroundwego

If I were living in AZ or WV, I wouldn't have voted for them and would have supported someone else in the primary and voted for an independent in the general election if my preferred candidate didn't prevail.

(And I don't see my proposals as "leftist").
@beckyromero of course, nobody would call you a leftist. Americans are center and right together, two parties.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
I consider myself a liberal Democrat. I don't believe my policy proposals are "leftist." I don't believe FDR's New Deal or LBJ's Great Society programs were "leftists."

@Roundandroundwego
nobody would call you a leftist.

You're wrong about that though.

A number of those on SW call me a leftist, socialist, etc., because of those beliefs or because some of the Democrats I've supported (Hillary, Biden, Harris).

Maybe some of that is because of my foreign policy positions (support for foreign aid, USAID, NATO, staying in the UN, etc.). But not always. I probably get as much vitriol from the far left as I do from the far right because of some of my other foreign policy and national defense positions (increasing the military budget, being against the withdrawl from Afghanistan, etc.)
@beckyromero since when is a liberal Democrat a to leftist,? You talked at length about your democratic liberal siding with the genocidal ecocidal oligarchs at length. A liberal likes laissez-faire, trickle down poverty for the masses and rich oligarchs who own the government. Liberals are not like us. We're not you. Do you get that I'd never ever call YOU a leftist? I've seen you not being a leftist here for years.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Roundandroundwego

I believe Harry Truman was a liberal Democrat. But because he ordered the atomic bombs dropped on Japan to end World War II, I highly doubt you'd call him a liberal Democrat.

Same with FDR, JFK and LBJ, all of whom believe in using or threatening to use U.S. military force, in FDR's case to defeat Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and imperialism Japan.

To you, anyone to the 'right' of Lizzy Warren and Bernie Sanders is a warmongering conservative.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment