Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Reality check – would free NYC buses really attract “addicts and vagrants”, like opponents claim?



Photo above – Candidate Zohran Mamdani becomes testy during an appearance on Stephen Colbert, when asked to give a thumbs up or thumbs down to Hamas terrorism. He later walked offstage, claiming the question was unfair.

Today’s man-bites-dog story: Reliably progressive newspaper The Washington Post (motto: “Democracy Dies in Dorkiness”) has taken a stance against NYC candidate Zohran Mamdani. The presumptive mayor who apparently no other candidate will be able to defeat. The issue? Free public buses. The WaPo opposes them. Stop laughing – this is 100% true. See link below.

The natural question to ask is: does the WaPo even have a dog in this fight? How are free New York buses a threat to DC?

We probably won’t see dozens of big city mayors trying to copy Mamdani’s campaign rhetoric. But the WaPo’s claim that free bus rides will result a system overwhelmed by addicts and vagrants is tough to swallow. After all, the NYC subway system is already overrun with addicts and vagrants, and it’s never been free. Addicts and vagrants are apparently a feature of city life in NY, not a bug. The Post missed the real reason to oppose free buses, subways, and free hotel rooms migrants: the city is already going broke, and Mamdani has pledged to end public school programs for gifted students as a way to make ends meet.

Hmmm . . . free bus fare for those without a buck, or keep trying to improve public schools? Hey . . . is this a trick question?

Maybe the Washington Post smells blood in the water, with Mamdani’s campaign. Zohran recently stalked offstage during a taping of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert because he took exception to terrorism and antisemitism questions. On the way home from the taping (which so far hasn’t aired) Mamdani had to dodge city residents asking if he would formally and clearly renounce the imposition of Sharia Islamic law in New York City when elected.

I don’t think Mamdani actually promised Sharia law as part of his campaign. Getting people to sign up for stoning or beheading for consensual acts like adultery and sodomy might be a tough sell in NY. But taking a step back from Jihad and Fatwahs might be a good idea. It might even help the city save money in the long run.

I’m just sayin’ . . .



Washington Post blasts Mamdani's free bus proposal, warns it would attract ‘vagrants and drug addicts'

Zohran Mamdani says “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” asked him to play on-air 'game' about Israel's war on Gaza
Top | New | Old
exchrist · 36-40
The best way to save the city money is green roofs both solar and green house. Then a fair tax system (flat tax) or progressive tax . And drinking age of 18; but that’s moreso a national tax revenue proposal; free public transit would allow that. Due to decreases in the population of working age and child bearing citizens. free day care might be very helpful too.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@exchrist i am completely in favor of solar panels, wind turbines, and progressive taxes.

i am against government subsidies to pick winners and losers in the energy market, and against having half the nation pay zero income taxes at all.
exchrist · 36-40
@SusanInFlorida the highest earners are paying the lowest tax rate. I advocate a flat tax
pdockal · 56-60, M
People will vote for him because they want everything free & don't understand how it actually works
Plus the other candidates aren't attractive (politically)
I'm glad i don't live or work in NYC
hopefully it won't infect state taxes
Avectoijesuismoi · 36-40
@pdockal the solution is of course there won't be any free buses because there will be no money to pay drivers, fuel, maintenance etc so there will actually be no buses to get a free ride on
pdockal · 56-60, M
@Avectoijesuismoi

The people he's pandering to don't understand that
He'll raise taxes and fees etc
Avectoijesuismoi · 36-40
@pdockal There is never anything for "free' the cost just gets side shifted.
I have been guilty a few times of telling "political type people" to stop talking shit to their faces and to come up with a plan to do things that would actually make a tangible and lasting difference for the people and they should then tell the people exactly how it is going to be funded.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@FreddieUK well, we can state factually that Mamdani fled the Colbert show, and fled the sidewalk when asked about sharia law. we can state that he is uncomfortable speaking on those topics.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@Avectoijesuismoi the diaspora (migration) of muslims to western countries is not only an escape from local political conditions. they are sometimes on a mission to replace legitimate laws in their new country of residence with sharia.

a bunch of muslims in texas were recently arrested for running a protection racket - they were going around to bars and liquor stores, threatening to demonstrate or outright close them - unless contributions to the local mosque were forthcoming.
Avectoijesuismoi · 36-40
@SusanInFlorida I know very many nice Muslim people, those sort are the ones I was referring to they are hiding behind and using Sharia law for their own objectives.
In this case extortion. A while back now a bunch of them tried a similar thing in Dubai no problem the Dubai police came arrested and they all got a one way ticket to go to jail. They try and pull things that would get them sent to jail very quickly elsewhere because the penalty is not as harsh. There were equally a bunch of IS that tried nonsense in Saudi Arabia they became headless well the ones they didn't just shoot.
exchrist · 36-40
I think it’d encourage people to work one fewer obstacle to getting paid
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@exchrist i doubt if bus fare is keeping people from looking for a job.
exchrist · 36-40
@SusanInFlorida it’s making it harder for the poor to get to employment opportunities
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
BohoBabe · M
@SusanInFlorida California isn't using social programs to reduce crime, they're just making it illegal to be homeless.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@BohoBabe homelessness should not be a crime. but it should be against the law to:

1 - set up tents in public spaces which blocks access to government agencies and stores (set them up in abandoned mall parking lots)

2 - public defecation

3 - public sex acts/prostitution

4 - selling and use of heroin, crack, fentanyl

5 - mass shoplifting events
BohoBabe · M
@SusanInFlorida Sure, but those things are the result of a system that makes people poor.

Crime is bad, but if you allow poverty, then the natural result is crime. If we want less crime, we should fund social programs to eliminate poverty.
idontcareok · 70-79, M

 
Post Comment