[@SW-Admin ]
Interesting. The BS is off the chart here.
If you can manage to put a couple of your neurons together, you MIGHT notice, that there is NO WSJ Article copied in its entirety or in part, without proper accreditation here.
So, what's the point of your "note of correction"?
I don't buy for one second that you have been receiving formal copyright notices regarding articles from the Wall Street Journal. There's just one butt hurt MAGA guy, and perhaps some of his fake accounts. And you know who that is, and you very well know this is about his MAGA butt hurt, NOT copyright violations. I don't want to insult your intelligence by playing along with your fantasy.
I appreciate that you want to insure copyright laws are not violated. but NOT ONE THING in this post violates any copyright laws.
But while we're at it, are you going to be doing anything about the Pedophilia permeating through SW posts? How about Revenge Porn? How about Solicitation? I'm sure you would agree all this is more serious than haggling over copyright laws, especially when FULL accreditation has been provided.