Yeah, but it's back now and they're blaming it on a coding error.
That doesnt mean someone didn't make the error intentionally, of course, and I wouldn't be surprised if Trump muses about how parts of the Constitution don't belong there, but at the end of the day, at most, its a distraction.
That doesnt mean someone didn't make the error intentionally, of course, and I wouldn't be surprised if Trump muses about how parts of the Constitution don't belong there, but at the end of the day, at most, its a distraction.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@MistyCee I think they were betting that people wouldn't notice, I'm glad we have people watching this stuff. Trump already stated he doesn't believe in parts of the constitution when asked or however he framed it, it wasn't good. So to erase the constitution from govt websites is sus.
@SatanBurger Sus, sure, but not a serious threat. He'll get more mileage out of folks pointing it out then he would by doing it.
Seems a lot like when he leaked a single page of his tax returns and Maddow went nuts about it then a thwarted plot to actually fool people into thinking those parts aren't in the Constitution.
Similar to putting Lawrence Taylor on stage with him. The controversy distracts and also keeps him relevant.
Seems a lot like when he leaked a single page of his tax returns and Maddow went nuts about it then a thwarted plot to actually fool people into thinking those parts aren't in the Constitution.
Similar to putting Lawrence Taylor on stage with him. The controversy distracts and also keeps him relevant.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@MistyCee At the same time, he could rewrite the constitution and if people didn't notice that could be dangerous so I'm glad it was noticed. Thanks.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
Laws made Murka uncomfortable. You do not do international law, either.