What do you think about Representative John Lewis not accepting Donald Trump as the legitimate POTUS?

Poll - Total Votes: 12

The polls look right. I see no surprise here.

It was MSNBC; what do you expect.

It doesn't matter what Lewis thinks.

Trump is facing some real hard times with the enemies he has made.

Show Results

You may vote on multiple answers.

MSNBC conducted a Poll asking whether Jon Lewis should accept Trump as POTUS.
The results shocked me.
91% agreed that Lewis should keep his view on Trump as an illegitimate President.
77% were Republicans.
97% were women of all parties.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User

It's documented that Trump was assisted by the Russians to win the election. No, Trump is not a legitimate Potus and John Lewis is correct.

Pfuzylogic · M

97% of Democrats believe exactly that!

Ptolemy · M

Documented where? There was no voter fraud found and the only one KNOWN to have broken the law was Clinton.

Pfuzylogic · M

@Ptolemy: I will agree with her. These documents are not public but the investigations have started. Just because Trump doesn't use the CIA and prefers Wikileaks doesn't mean that he will be protected by the political winds of DC.

Ptolemy · M

You have to be able to see that it seems fishy that they "have documents that aren't public" now.

After months of the FBI, and intelligence community saying there was no evidence of interference, including days and weeks after the election.

Even president Obama on Nov. 28 I think had a press conference and said the elections over there was nothing innapropriate and that people need to get over it. (Pretty sure he was pointing that at trump)

Then suddenly "there was interfererence"... where, how?

And after giving trump so much grief about not accepting the results its a real eye opener.

Its to easy to make a serious claim and then claim "national security" because there is no way to respond to it.

If there was "influence" what was it and where"?

And if they are going to be sanctions, what are we then saying about our involvement in Israels last election. Or all the money that was donated to Hillary Clinton's campaign from foreign donors? Is that not an attempt to influence an election?

This isn't a simple issue but you have to consider both sides.

Ptolemy · M

Still have seen no evidence he was "assisted"