Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Are white supremacists jealous of us?

if they really thought we were less they wouldn't think about us all the damn time 🤷🏿‍♂
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
I think there's certain movements that attract narcissists. Narcs often surround themselves with others who enable them due to their followers looking up to them and wishing they had whatever perceived traits. It's a desire for power and that attracts narcs.

The rest of them are enablers, if you observed their lives, there's probably something wrong there.
@SatanBurger You’re not wrong — narcissists do cling to movements where influence gets mistaken for integrity. And yeah, folks around them? Sometimes it’s enabling… sometimes it’s survival.

Your take reminded me of Ida B. Wells — ever read her? She argued white mobs accused Black men of rape as projection. Guilty hearts casting blame to protect power.

Made me wonder… in the movements you mentioned, do you think the same kind of projection’s at play?
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@AmeriKKKasWorstNightmare I'll have to check out Ida B Wells, the name sounds familiar but never read anything by them.

And oh for sure, it's all about projection. There's a list of 50 maga just this year caught from everything to domestic violence to grooming and CP. But more of those cases are actually CP and people did digging on their social media, most of these people were obsessing over gay people and grooming.

So there's projection politics for sure I'd say Ida was smart to mention that and back then you know white males were assaulting black women as a form of control and fear. It's likely Ida picked up a pattern
@SatanBurger You really get it — if every obsession they have with controlling people's sexuality is projecting, the obsession with “protecting kids” might mask what they don’t wanna face in themselves. That kind of projection been around a long time. disturbing to think they might be the groomers they accuse queer people of.

Reminds me of The ISIS Papers by Dr. Frances Cress Welsing. She broke down how the Black phallus — what folks now call “BBC” became this symbol of fear in white supremacy. Not just sexual, but symbolic: power, dominance, and the threat of genetic extinction. So all that moral panic? It’s often just disguised fear of losing control… of being replaced. It's why they call everyone cuck and obsess over our phallus now.

Ida saw it in her time, Welsing expanded on it later… and you? You clearly see a pattern today.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@AmeriKKKasWorstNightmare I think it needs to be studied more as I think there's something there but as long as we have a system that is white nationalist we never will. Those things do need to be studied more though it's too big of a pattern.

I have a list of red flags and one of them is that. There's a difference between someone who genuinely cares won't signal out groups of people for politics like right wingers do when they target gay people or others but if they ever do that, I'm leery. I can't prove anything about these people not knowing them but if I'm ever around someone whose like that at work or just wherever, I'll avoid them.

They can be the kindest person and if I sense they project like that I leave no matter what. It's that large of a pattern.
@SatanBurger Facts — your radar’s sharp, and you’re right to trust it. Patterns that loud don’t lie. And yeah, in a system built on white nationalism, certain truths get buried on purpose. That’s why Dr. Welsing's work still hits — even decades later.

In The ISIS Papers, she talked about white supremacist systems projecting fear onto the Black body — especially the Black male body. She argued that what folks now call “BBC” isn’t just fetishization, it’s fear wrapped in fascination. In The ISIS Papers, she broke down how the Black male body — especially the phallus — became a symbol of deep racial fear. What people now call “BBC” was once used to stoke full-on terror: this idea that Black men were lurking, threatening white womanhood. That lie wasn’t just social — it fueled lynchings, laws, whole eras of policy.

And it’s wild how that pattern still echoes. Look at how ICE frames migrants — same formula: dark-skinned men, painted as sexual threats, “protect the women and children” rhetoric… all projection, all rooted in control and fear. Same thing they use against gays and migrants were used on my people.

So it makes me wonder — when they obsess over controlling or criminalizing the Black body, especially in right-wing spaces… do you think Dr. Welsing was right? Is all that “BBC” talk, that fear and oversexualization, really just a modern form of penis envy?

Curious how you see it.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@AmeriKKKasWorstNightmare Yeah I'd agree with that for sure. I wish it was said more openly as I think it warrants seriously studying it. It would help to find solutions to projection politics which is what the right is doing currently
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@AmeriKKKasWorstNightmare Thanks for the compliment on me being sharp
@SatanBurger You being sharp isn’t even up for debate — that came through from the first comment. It’s rare to find someone who can spot the pattern and name it with clarity. Real ones like that are few.

And I feel you — if we actually studied these dynamics openly, we might stop mistaking projection for “policy.” Folks be out here building platforms on fears they can’t even name. But once you trace it back — whether it’s how they frame gay folks, migrants, or Black bodies — it always circles back to the same root: fear dressed up as morality.

Lowkey, I’ve been thinking… with how common the “BBC” trope is online — memes, jokes, even how people flirt — it’s kind of wild how it carries both power and stigma, depending on who's holding the lens.

But when you really look at history… it makes sense. The Klan didn’t just lynch Black men — they castrated us. Because deep down, they feared the BBC. And that fear? It’s what birthed the one-drop rule. They knew Black genes weren’t recessive — it only took one drop from a BBC to erase a white bloodline. One moment of touch, and centuries of “purity” could vanish. That’s why so much of the system was built to keep white women away from Black men — laws, media, violence — all to protect that fragile legacy.

So sometimes I wonder… do you think the BBC is more than just a trope? That maybe it’s one of the most potent threats to white supremacy? Not because of what it does in bed — but because of what it does to power?

Real talk… they’ve always known where the real power lives.
Between our legs.

What’s your take on that?
@AmeriKKKasWorstNightmare more curious on your take now. Seen you post about yt ppls replacement anxiety