Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

How ICE’s massive cash infusion is poised to transform America.

How ICE’s massive cash infusion is poised to transform America
Republicans gave $45 billion to help ICE detain hundreds of thousands of immigrants — and another $100 billion to further supercharge Trump’s mass deportations.

July 7, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT
By Hayes Brown, MSNBC Opinion Writer/Editor

With a cash infusion of around $150 billion toward immigration enforcement and border security in last week’s budget bill, congressional Republicans handed the Trump administration the resources needed to carry out its mass deportation policy. The intended result is as aggressive as it is likely transformative: Immigration and Customs Enforcement is slated to become the largest law enforcement agency in the country as dozens of new detention centers spring up to hold hundreds of thousands of immigrants awaiting expulsion.

In the six months since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, there has been a surge in ICE raids, detentions and removals. The majority of targets in this increase are not the hardened criminals that MAGA supporters and administration officials claim. Shifts in policy have already stripped hundreds of thousands of immigrants of their legal protections to remain in the country. But the wide-ranging sweeps ICE has launched in churches, at farms and in Home Deport parking lots still haven’t resulted in enough arrests to satisfy White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who has spent weeks insisting that more dedicated resources are needed to meet his goal of 3,000 arrests per day.

Republicans gave Miller the tools he wants when they passed their budget reconciliation bill Thursday. The two largest buckets of funding in the act provide $45 billion each toward building Trump’s border wall and vastly expanding America’s immigration detention capacity. By comparison, that’s more than 13 times the current annual ICE budget for detention ($3.4 billion) and more than five times the entire annual budget of the Federal Bureau of Prisons ($8.6 billion).

An estimate from the American Immigration Council determines that if the money allocated is spread out to roughly $14 billion per year, then it would be enough for ICE to maintain around 116,000 beds. At present, the agency’s budget supports it holding about 41,000 detainees. Notably, though, those capacity figures assume that every detainee is granted a bed. There are reports of inhumane conditions in existing detention centers, where there were 56,000 immigrants in custody as of June 15. In other words, we could easily see the number of detainees more than double to fill the expanded capacity in hastily built detention centers.

Once this new funding hits ICE’s accounts, it will likely be spent as quickly as possible — with little oversight for how it’s doled out. The New York Times reported in April that ICE has already asked contractors for “proposals to provide new detention facilities, transportation, security guards, medical support and other administrative services worth as much as $45 billion over the next two years.” Much of that money will go toward private companies contracted to build and run these facilities, some of which have been major political backers for Trump and the GOP.

Beyond the funding for detention, there’s more money still. An analysis from the Washington Office on Latin America notes that ICE will also be getting $15 billion devoted toward physically removing migrants from the country. (Whether that is to their country of origin or some random third state is apparently a matter for the administration to decide, according to a recent Supreme Court decision.) Another $16.2 billion will be for the Department of Homeland Security to hire new ICE, Customs and Border Protection and Border Patrol agents. About $8 billion of that will be for ICE to hire 8,500 new officers with another $860 million for paying recruitment and retention bonuses and $600 million for expanding the agency’s hiring capacity.

Local and state officers are getting in on the gold rush, with $3.5 billion dedicated toward compensating states for detaining noncitizens and $10 billion to reimburse border states for hardening their borders. Given how eagerly sheriff’s offices and police departments compete for federal funding for other programs, it’s likely that many will leap at the chance to share in this bonanza.

Indeed, the keenest horror is that there’s now such a clear financial incentive to be in the deportation business. Catching and deporting migrants is set to be a growth industry, and the urge to see a return on the investment will help keep the machine moving. The current private prison pipeline will pale in comparison to the churn that will be needed to keep these camps filled with not just the undocumented, but the denaturalized and newly stateless, victims of the administration’s efforts to deny birthright citizenship and strip their political enemies of their rights. It will be the job of the newly hired ICE agents to find the people to transform into numbers on their monthly quota report.

Already investors can see that the potential fiscal returns for exploiting human suffering are higher than they’ve been in over 150 years. As of last month, according to The Associated Press, “CoreCivic’s stock has risen in price by 56% and Geo’s by 73%” since Trump’s win last year. Those numbers are only likely to increase as a flood of cash comes gushing into the gulf between morality and maximized profits.

It’s worth noting that this is all still in the realm of potential outcomes, despite the amount of money that will now be sloshing around the system. NBC News reported last month that ICE has been struggling to retain the agents it has, let alone expand the number it can hire. Moreover, filling those new billets wouldn’t happen overnight. A 2017 report from the DHS Office of the Inspector General noted with some skepticism that to hire 10,000 new ICE agents as Trump wanted even then, there’d need to be at least 500,000 applicants. But the money that Congress has now authorized means that Miller’s dreams at least have the potential to be actualized.

Those funds Republicans have so thoughtlessly turned over in exchange for lower tax rates are now poised to transform America. More crops will rot on the vines as ICE raids become a more regular occurrence and the number of people doing the work dwindles. It’s the wrongful deportations like that of Kilmar Abrego Garcia and so many others that have drawn most of our focus to date. But it’s the supposed successes that this bill enables that will test our character as a nation.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
missyann · 56-60
@basilfawlty89 @JSul3 This is the most outrageous BS I have heard from the left in a while. This is exactly what makes people throw their hands up and say. NO MORE. You don’t break into someone’s home and if they offer you a bologna sandwich, say no I want a New York strip. You accept that baloney sandwich with a humble heart and say.
“ thank you “

An illegal criminal is in no position to demand anything. Do you want specific food ? Fine, go buy the food you want. You want to cook your own food, fine, you find pots and pans a big spoon start a fire, and have at it. You want unlimited shower time? Fine, when you can live someplace where unlimited showers are an option. Stay in there all day. But until then you accept the food you were given and thank the people who cook it for you and appreciate the shower time you have.

We have enough entitlement from our own citizens. We most certainly don’t need to accept it from criminals. YES I mean CRIMINALS !!!! The left acts like every time we say, criminals, that we mean, murderers and rapists. A criminal is someone who breaks our laws. Like I don’t know, perhaps, breaking and entering, stealing Social Security numbers, lying on legal government forms abusing public assistance programs drug and alcohol offenses ect…..

I have absolutely no problem with my tax money being used to pay for our veterans. I believe veterans should have free healthcare. and rooms at hotels that are given to illegal criminals should go to homeless veterans. Just because the administration is not taking care of the veterans in the exact way, I think they should doesn’t mean that I don’t give money and support charities, who take care of veterans. Just because the Trump administration doesn’t do everything exactly the way I think they should do it. That doesn’t mean that I shouldn’t vote for them. No administration does everything exactly the way everyone thinks they should

American taxpayer money should be used for American Citizen and when I wish additions are taken care of, then we can help other countries But I’ll be damned if I ever support my taxpayer money being used to support illegal criminals. You want illegal, criminals taking care of them. You personally finance them

As I watch the illegal criminalBS expanding I also see the Trump agenda on illegal, criminals, expanding, and it can’t come soon enough
@missyann As usual you disregard facts and at this point are just dishonest because you don't have the excuse of being ignorant now.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@missyann And you support a man who disrespects and spits on veterans and defunded programs for vets.
@missyann We know, to you criminal means anyone darker than Morticia Addams.
JSul3 · 70-79
@missyann You said:
"A criminal is someone who breaks our laws. Like I don’t know, perhaps, breaking and entering, stealing Social Security numbers, lying on legal government forms abusing public assistance programs drug and alcohol offenses ect….."

Ok ...no issue with that, but you must prove your claim in a court of law.

BTW, the Miami Herald reports that those being arrested, over 70% have no criminal record.

What if YOU were arrested and dumped into a cell in FL or sent to El Salvador?
@JSul3 Exactly. To be a criminal you have to be convicted of something.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@missyann so, you would be fine hosting jaywalkers in CECOT and Alligator Alcatraz then I take it?

If you knew anything about law (hi, I actually switched to computer science from law) you'd know that a civil case and criminal case differs, so do misdemeanours and felonies. The supreme law of any country that defines itself as a Constitutional Republic (which IS a form of representative democracy) is the Constitution. No act may violate the Constitution. The Constitution may only be altered the proper procedures and necessary consensus via voting by respective branches of government. Until that occurs, the Constitution must be followed.

Habeas Corpus (due process) is enshrined in the US Constitution for ANYONE on US soil.

I recommend you brush up on basic Civics and Constitutional Law, in addition to Criminal Law.

I shall close in Latin:

Sic Semper Tyrannus.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@missyann oh, and while I never finished law school, I do know how to debate and employ logic and reason, so...

@basilfawlty89 I have noticed with Conservatives there is also a bizarre latching on to Victorian moral ideas that crime is a moral failing so shoplifting is as much an indicator of a future mass shooter as a felony with these folks because they are a "fallen" individual morally.
missyann · 56-60
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I’m really not sure what you’re talking about. You really need to say exactly what you mean

Crime is a “ moral decision “? Almost in every case, people have the ability and intelligence, to make the choice to commit the crime or obey the law.

Crime isn’t always a felony. I missed in the minute is a crime. Felonies come with heavier consequences and punishment.

A person has the ability to choose to come through the point of i entry, and not jump the line ahead of people who have been waiting years and have followed the law
missyann · 56-60
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow OMG Me being racist is all you ever have when you don’t have a logical answer

Nothing to do with race nothing to do with race nothing to do with race. About the rule of law, about the rule of law about the rule of law.

You sound like a broken record
@missyann IF you don't want to be called racist, don't be racist. Very simple.


And you are lying. It has everything to do with race and nothing to do with the law. Even the Trump Administration is open about that.

You can lie and make up excuses all you want. The truth is the only people who support this now are those who want to make America white again. Nothing more.


For one it is not "the law" when the constitution is just ignored entirely, courts are ignored entirely, people are abducted within warrants, probable cause, and in defiance of the courts and taken across state lines to dungeons.

That is kidnapping and human trafficking according to the actual law.

Do you believe people deserve to be sent to a concentration camp for jaywalking? Simple question.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@missyann I love how you completely glossed over what I said, because it ruins your whole diatribe.

You know...you talk about a "moral decision" in regards to unlawful acts.
Stealing food for your child if they're starving is also an unlawful act. But you can be damn sure if I had a child and they were starving, I'd steal. Before you yell "moral decision", my ancestors on my mother's side had to do that when the Blight came over the potato crops and the British confiscated our food.
@basilfawlty89 Exactly. legal and moral are not and never have been synonyms. Some of the worst atrocities in history were legal in the country involved.
missyann · 56-60
@basilfawlty89 With all due respect the British did not steal your food. It was a different time. I’m happy to say society has come along way In this country, no one has to steal food. There are food banks, you can knock on the door of any church in this country, and you will be fed. I don’t know of one church who would deny someone food

No one has to make the choice to break the law if, for some reason, they do feel they need to. They will get the opportunity to plead their case in front of a judge. I have broken laws. Speeding running a red light, and I had to pay the consequences. There are consequences to every action

No one have to cross our borders outside the point of entry. And the person does not do this. There are consequences and one of those consequences could be deportation.

I’m not” holier than thou “ I am just stating facts
JSul3 · 70-79
@missyann If the US became as horrific as some of the nations these immigrants are fleeing from, would you seek a better life in another land?
missyann · 56-60
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow
Seems to make you feel big and bad, and somehow vindicated by calling me a racist. I don’t care if you’re black white, purple or green if you’re an atheist or Christian if you are a man woman transgender I DON’T CARE I care whether you are legal. Because this is my home. I am not going to apologize because I was fortunate enough to be born here.

We either have completely open borders and hang a sign saying” All Welcome “ or we have control over who comes in our country. I want people who aren’t going to bring drugs, sex trafficking, and criminal activity. I don’t care what nationality you are. Come into the country the right way the legal way and get legal documentation that says you can be here. Otherwise I support detention and deportation.
JSul3 · 70-79
@missyann Not a fan of the Statue of Liberty, eh Missy?

Bet you forgot about Jesus' Sermon on the Mount.
Next thing you will tell me is, you're not a Christian.
missyann · 56-60
@JSul3 I don’t know. Thank God I have never been faced with that

Not all these immigrants are fleeing horrific situation’s. If they were, they would want to make sure that they were doing everything in their power to be able to stay in the protection of the United States. I would think that following the law would ensure safety quicker since breaking the law as an immigrant could get you deported.
missyann · 56-60
@JSul3 The “ huddled masses “. Went through Ellis island, which was the point of entry I’m not saying, don’t come in I’m saying come legally

I could be wrong, but I don’t ever remember Jesus telling some people it was OK to break the law. I believe in the Bible had civil laws. The penalties and punishments were much more harsh.
JSul3 · 70-79
@missyann Not everyone entered via Ellis Island.

Again, entering the US illegally is a misdemeanor, not a felony.

While I can not speak for every single person, the vast majority come seeking jobs and a better life.

Should we not give them that opportunity?

Those who cross in other areas, from what I have seen, they seek out the border patrol and ask for asylum. I have never seen any of these folks carrying assault weapons.

The system is broken. We have folks that have been here for years, that still are waiting on the government to process their claim....and Trump wants to just sweep them up and throw them in a prison without due process.

Having masked men, with no ID, in unmarked vehicles grabbing people off the streets.....sorry Missy. You can't square that, no matter what you say.

Jesus's actions were not about lawlessness, but about revealing a higher law of love, compassion, and grace.

Trump/Holman/Miller have no love, compassion, or grace.
They lack humanity....and so do those that stand with them.
missyann · 56-60
@JSul3 Unfortunately seeking a better life economically is not considered a reason for amnesty in an immigration hearing. It sounds like it should, but if that was the case, everybody in the world would be entitled Yes, I do feel bad for some of these people, but we have to have a standard law. There are way too many variables. Just like with anything in the United States, that we’ve tried to do good to help people has been abused,
This is just an example. Medicaid abuse.
You have a poor woman with two little kids he really doesn’t qualify but we’re gonna let this one pass well “ this one “ turns into 1 million “ this one “. Immigration is the exact same way.
We will let “ this one “ pass, and then the variables change

The law Has to be standard, black and white. If not, it needs to be decided in Congress who gets to come in and under what conditions. Who is going to decide the conditions who gets to decide who comes in? or we can say it is illegal for anyone to cross the border except at the point of entry.

I have Searched everywhere for this podcast, and I finally found it but it is under Yahoo “” the due process lie & the Maryland man hoax w/ Andrew Arthur
He is an immigration judge who worked under Clinton Bush, Obama he is truly is He explains do you process in the immigration steps better than anyone I’ve ever heard. You have to listen to him until the end.

A misdemeanor is still a crime. It doesn’t have to be a felony.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@missyann Can we please just stop pretending this has anything to do with the law. When you are supporting cops committing felonies and rounding people up based on racial profiling to make quotas.

When you have the thug in chief arresting judges for enforcing the actual laws including the constitution which Trumps your feelings. Pun intended.
@missyann A misdemeanor is a crime yes. But it is the definition of dishonestly to pretend it is equivalent to a felony and to pretend that punishment for jaywalking and attempted murder are on the same level.