Look for TACO to be TACO

Telling 9 million people to evacuate Tehran "immediately" cannot be interpreted as anything other than a threat of an imminent nuclear attack.

Then in a threat to Ali Khamenei: "Supreme Leader is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.”

TACO will do neither. Even in his muddled mind he knows this is not a situation that calls for nuclear war. Besides it's not good for his businesses or his grifting. He will not take out Khamenei because that would make him a target of other States. He knows while he is President no individual or radical group will be able to assassinate him. But a belligerent State intelligence community probably could.

So rest easy TACO will chicken out as usual.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

jackjjackson · 70-79, M

IF the President does anything it will be to authorize a B-2 bunker busting bomb run or two.

Roundandroundwego · 61-69

@jackjjackson how many MOABs would you need to bust a system of underground tunnels like that in North Korea?

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

jackjjackson · 70-79, M

Who is telling you the president made a nuke threat? @MoveAlong

MoveAlong · 70-79, M

@jackjjackson Almost everyone who doesn't have a brain worm.

jackjjackson · 70-79, M

Provide even ONE link quoting the President threatening to “nuke” Iran. @MoveAlong

MoveAlong · 70-79, M

@jackjjackson Jackson, I'm not going to argue about this. Telling 9 million people whose government is under military attack that they need to evacuate the Capitol City immediately is a nuclear threat. Disagree if you want. I don't GAS.

Sheesh...no wonder so many people block you.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

MasterLee · 56-60, M

@MoveAlong you always argue

jackjjackson · 70-79, M

As I knew you made up your own interpretation. I seek accuracy and some people are embarrassed when caught out stating opinions as fact perhaps they block me. On the other hand the site is loaded with patriotic US citizen taxpayers with common sense that feel exactly the same as me. I simply ask the questions. You’re not the only one that could interpret it that way. Another interpretation is that the President believes that Israel will be doing that bombing. @MoveAlong

jackjjackson · 70-79, M

The reports are that the US has plenty of bunker busters to load onto B-1 bombers and fly directly to Iran or NK and drop one after another into the crater created by the previous crater until the job is completed and then fly back to Missouri in air refueling the entire way and back and never land anywhere other than home. In the case of No there is currently no need inasmuch as No is making no serious threats and is focused on its economy. If the President opts to do so in Iran it’s Nobel Peace Prize time fellas. @Roundandroundwego @whowasthatmaskedman

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

@jackjjackson I dont know just how "Novel" that Peace prize will be..But we could start by explaining how an American aircraft, flying from America, with an american crew, carrying an american Bomb of any size, at the orders of the President as commander in chief, and dropping said bomb on Iran is NOT an act of war against Iran. In spite of what Tom Cruise does..😷

jackjjackson · 70-79, M

Of course it’s an act of war however one which virtually the entire world would support and Iran has no means of retaliation. @whowasthatmaskedman

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

@jackjjackson I really dont like insulting people or acusing them of anything totally negative. Which leaves me at a loss to respond to that answer...So wrong in every respect..😷