Anxious
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

A president hostile to accountability will try to keep the public — and future generations — in the dark.

Why Trump is making an unprecedented effort to scrub the historical record
A president hostile to accountability will try to keep the public — and future generations — in the dark.

By Zeeshan Aleem

A new Associated Press analysis of President Donald Trump's many methods for destroying records raises the remarkable possibility that the Trump administration could "leave less for the nation’s historical record than nearly any before it." It's a useful lens for understanding how Trump conceals information to evade accountability and undermine democracy.

As the AP notes, there are many different ways that Trump is making it impossible to track what his administration is doing:

"The Trump administration is scrubbing thousands of government websites of history, legal records and data it finds disagreeable. It has sought to expand the executive branch’s power to shield from public view the government-slashing efforts of Elon Musk’s team and other key administration initiatives. Officials have used apps such as Signal that can auto-delete messages containing sensitive information rather than retaining them for recordkeeping. And they have shaken up the National Archives leadership and even ordered the rewriting of history on display at the Smithsonian Institution."

This all comes as HuffPost recently estimated that the White House has declined to release transcripts for about 80% of the president’s speeches and interactions with the press so far.

And Trump's first term involved many extraordinary attacks on recordkeeping, including reportedly routinely discarding papers in the White House fireplace, deriding his staff for taking notes and tearing up documents into tiny pieces. Trump also improperly stored classified material at Mar-a-Lago after he left office.

Much as a mob boss detests a paper trail, Trump is averse to the idea of keeping records.

As The Associated Press observes, the president is legally required to "keep up the historical record." But retention laws are difficult to enforce, which means that a lot of compliance with them effectively relies on the honor system.

Trump's view of honor systems, of course, is that they are for suckers. And he knows that he stands to benefit from keeping the public in the dark and avoiding mechanisms for accountability.

One way is that Trump gets to lessen real-time accountability to the public for his own positions. Refusing to track and publish public remarks and circumventing traceable policy recordkeeping makes it easier for the president and those around him to shirk responsibility for lies, broken promises, policy flip-flops or rhetoric that ages poorly. It allows him to reinvent and massage reality in his favor.

Trump also gets to avoid accountability for future investigations, whether from Congress or elsewhere. Much as a mob boss detests a paper trail, Trump is averse to the idea of keeping records of everything he and his inner circle are considering, as he constantly pursues schemes that push up against or transgress the law. Think about how text messages helped make the impeachment case against Trump's attempted quid pro quo with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Trump's first term. Think about testimony revealing that then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows burned documents during the same period that Trump made efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Trump isn't just keeping the public, the media and the courts in the dark. He's also making it harder for future generations of scholars to study our political era and understand how his government worked — and didn't work.


Zeeshan Aleem is a writer and editor for MSNBC Daily. Previously, he worked at Vox, HuffPost and Politico, and he has also been published in, among other places, The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Nation, and The Intercept.
Top | New | Old
Donald Trump's reported efforts to destroy or conceal historical records, rewrite public-facing information, use auto-deleting apps, and even intimidate the National Archives closely mirror George Orwell’s portrayal of authoritarian control over reality itself. Consider the following parallels:

🔥 1. Erasing the Historical Record

Trump:

“The Trump administration is scrubbing thousands of government websites of history, legal records and data it finds disagreeable.”
— Associated Press analysis

Orwell:

“Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.”
— Ministry of Truth motto (1984, p. 44)

In 1984, Winston Smith’s job at the Ministry of Truth is to destroy or revise past records so that they match the Party's current narrative. Similarly, Trump’s administration has sought to obscure or erase documents that could serve as a record of misdeeds — effectively vaporizing inconvenient facts.

📵 2. Communication that Self-Destructs

Trump:

“Officials have used apps such as Signal that can auto-delete messages...”

Orwell:

“People simply disappeared... every record of everything you had ever done was wiped out... you were abolished, annihilated: VAPORIZED was the usual word.”
— (1984, p. 54)

When a regime intentionally deletes its internal communications, it mimics the vaporization of people and records in Orwell’s dystopia, making scrutiny and accountability impossible.

🧠 3. Rewriting Reality

Trump:

“Refusing to track and publish public remarks and circumventing traceable policy recordkeeping... makes it easier for the president... to reinvent and massage reality.”

Orwell:

“The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth.”
— (1984, p. 44)

This is a textbook case of Orwellian doublethink — denying a fact while also knowing it’s true, and altering records to ensure the lie prevails.

📚 4. Historical Amnesia by Design

Trump:

“He's also making it harder for future generations of scholars to study our political era...”

Orwell:

“The past, he reflected, had not merely been altered, it had actually been destroyed.”
— (1984, p. 44)

In both cases, control over collective memory is the goal. Without historical records, future analysis becomes impossible, allowing authoritarianism to perpetuate itself unchallenged.

🚨 5. Surveillance State Echoes

While Trump’s behavior doesn’t extend to telescreens or Thought Police, his calls to surveil protestors, journalists, and political opponents, and his rhetoric around "enemies of the people" bear the psychic imprint of Orwell’s Two Minutes Hate and public scapegoating of figures like Emmanuel Goldstein.

🔚 Conclusion

Trump’s disdain for recordkeeping isn’t just about narcissism or chaos — it’s a deeply political act of erasure and control. As Orwell warned, totalitarianism begins by reshaping memory, and “if all others accepted the lie... the lie passed into history and became truth.”
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays
You should add the simplification of language... the people inside his movement only use half of the english vocabulary, so that issues that they are dealing with become more simplified.

Have you noticed that every immigrant that they don't like is an "illegal" now. Things like "asylum" or "green card holders" ... all the nuances in immigration status, are all reduced to this one word.

I read the Esther project, that was brought out by the herritage foundation yesterday. Certain organisations are pointing out that the ideas in there are being used by the Trump administration to attack universities and other people they don't like. Once you start reading it (it's only 33 pages long), you'll notice something weird happening. These protests that are happening right now, according to the project, all seem to be happening in a vacuum. It's almost as if these protest groups are "new", as if they're organised just because of the backlash of the october 7th attacks. History seems to start on october the 7th, these organisations pop up from nowhere, because the conflict has no other history going for it. And they are all reduced to a single word "antisemitism".

As Orwell warned, totalitarianism begins by reshaping memory, and “if all others accepted the lie... the lie passed into history and became truth.”

Yes... this is really clear. That's why journalists are kicked out of the press room, because they don't use "the gulf of America". The new reality is portrayed everywhere in the White House... Donald even does interviews, in front of a map showing "the gulf of America". Briefings are done in full view, like a spectacle, with red hats saying "Gulf of America". It needs to be accepted, just like it needs to be accepted that the elections in 2020 were rigged.
@Kwek00 Fantastic insights. Didn't think of that. The flattening of language. So true!
@Kwek00 Authoritarian leaders often flatten language—a phenomenon marked by the reduction of linguistic complexity, emotional nuance, and intellectual ambiguity. This flattening serves both psychological and political purposes.

1. Control of Thought through Language

As George Orwell famously illustrated in 1984, limiting language constrains the scope of thought. Authoritarian leaders tend to:

Eliminate ambiguity: Complex or nuanced terms are discouraged. Instead, they promote binary oppositions like loyal vs. traitor, patriot vs. enemy.

Reduce vocabulary: This makes dissent more difficult to articulate and complexity harder to express.

Use slogans and mantras: Repetitive, simplified phrases (e.g., “Make America Great Again,” “Enemies of the People”) replace debate with performative loyalty.

2. Undermining Independent Judgment

Flattened language discourages introspection and critical thought:

Emotional manipulation: Authoritarian speech often replaces analytic language with emotional cues—anger, fear, pride—bypassing reason.

Devaluation of expertise: Words like “elite,” “intellectual,” or “academic” become pejorative, while vague, populist language (e.g., “common sense,” “real people”) is valorized.

Erasure of complexity: Opposing viewpoints are not rebutted but ridiculed or declared illegitimate.

3. Symbolic and Ritualistic Speech

Authoritarian language becomes less communicative and more performative:

Language as loyalty signal: The purpose of speech becomes proving allegiance rather than conveying meaning.

Compulsory repetition: Phrases must be repeated not for their informational value but to show conformity.

4. Examples

Trump: Preference for simple words, nicknames, and blunt repetition (“Fake News,” “Sleepy Joe”) to mobilize and polarize.

Hitler: Used emotionally charged, mythic language with Manichaean simplicity (Aryan vs. Jew, German vs. traitor).

Putin: Uses bureaucratic vagueness and euphemism (e.g., “special military operation”) to obscure and control narratives.

5. Contrast: Democratic Language

Democracies, by contrast, require a plurality of voices and interpretations, which leads to:

Ambiguity, irony, and contradiction being tolerated—even valued.

Language used to negotiate difference, not suppress it.

Leaders expected to explain, persuade, and justify—not merely to declare.

Summary

Authoritarian leaders flatten language to narrow thought, demand conformity, and maintain control. It is not merely a rhetorical choice but an instrument of governance, shaping how people feel, think, and relate to power.
Abuse, fraud, and waste

22Michelle · 70-79, T
And yet his cult will still defend him.

 
Post Comment