Harvard President Stands Up Against Trump

Harvard University on Monday rejected demands from the Trump administration as it threatens the school’s federal funding as part of a broader clampdown on higher education. The university said that while it is and will continue to engage in reforms, those changes should not be mandated by Washington.

“No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue,” wrote President Alan Garber.
In response, the administration said it would freeze $2.2 billion in multi year grants to Harvard, along with a $60 million contract.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

MistyCee

Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda.

31% of Americans believed in Trump and put voted against humanity.

ElwoodBlues · M

@MistyCee Actually, I believe Harvard's tax exempt status is written into the 1780 Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, a document still in force and older than the US Constitution.

MistyCee

@ElwoodBlues Interesting. I doubt Trump's IRS would care much about a State Constitution.

ElwoodBlues · M

@MistyCee I haven't a clue. Do you know any constitutional scholars? Obama used to teach con law and he says what Tяump is trying to do to academic freedom is illegal. but maybe that's hyperbole.

MistyCee

@ElwoodBlues I do know folks who teach Con Law, but the analysis with this SCOTUS is pretty all over the place.

I wouldn't call it hyperbole, though. The thing is that if five justices agree that a President is immune, that the militia clause is meaningless, that the 14th Amendment or any other Constitutional provision means something different, than that's the law, no matter how "wrong" it may seem to others.

Law Professors can scream all they want about precedent, interpretation, public policy, etc, but my guess is that the Roberts Court will end up slow walking rather than resisting this Executive branch for as long as it's able to without any assistance from the Legislative Branch and practically zero enforcement power.

Roundandroundwego · 61-69

@MistyCee cultural Marxism. Too bad you can't be real Marxists, and you got nobody on the left in politics

MistyCee

@Roundandroundwego Would you care to explain how cultural Marxism relates to my last response?

Or were you just referring to the folks at Harvard?

Roundandroundwego · 61-69

@MistyCee cultural Marxism is the theory that universities harbor an anti American Marxist cadre that's causing youth to question capitalism. Trump's quoting the Nazis from the 1930's who first came up with this theory - I am descended directly from people who hated Jew Marxist academia in 1939. Nazis. Gahead and pretend I don't know nothing! Pretend you got no fascism in your mainstream, not in the Dems, nevah!

ElwoodBlues · M

@MistyCee I have to open in an incognito window to see what the other person is saying. So question capitalism is a sin and that sin turns one into a "cultural Marxist." Fascinating!

MistyCee

@Roundandroundwego Great. I just wasn't sure if I'd somehow stepped into the Cultural Marxism abyss when talking about SCOTUS, Trump and Con Law Professors.

I understand generally, at least some of the conspiracy theories that persuade people to support Trump, including that one, but I didn't mean to step into them.