Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Seems Like the Director of National Intelligence Isn't Too Intelligent.

Tulsi Gabbard declared her residency in Texas. Then she voted in Hawai'i.

As Tulsi Gabbard completed her transformation from a Hawaii Democratic politician to a MAGA surrogate last year, she put down stakes in a far redder state. Gabbard and her husband bought a home outside of Austin and declared under oath last June that they were “resident(s) of the State of Texas.”

But a few months later, Gabbard voted in the 2024 general election back in Hawaii.

Election law experts said Gabbard’s vote, coupled with her claiming a homestead tax break on her Texas home, raises questions about whether she properly cast her ballot and illustrates the complexity of state voting laws.

Gabbard is now director of national intelligence under President Donald Trump. Trump has continued to press false claims of widespread voter fraud and demanded further actions by state and federal authorities to address it.

Representatives for Gabbard said she never intended to abandon her longtime Hawaii residency, despite signing the sworn declaration calling herself a Texas resident.

“Director Gabbard was, is, and intends to remain a Hawaii resident,” Gabbard’s lawyers, Jesse Binnall and Jason Greaves, wrote in a cease-and-desist letter sent to CNN prior to this article’s publication. “That is where she lives, pays taxes, and, of course, votes.”

Under Hawaii voting regulations, when voters have a homeowner’s tax exemption, that home is presumed to be their residence for election purposes.

Gabbard’s attorneys said she applied for a homestead tax exemption, which Texas law only allows on a principal residence, because she “took the advice of local officials” who told her it was required to shield her address from public view. Her office said she was facing a significant security threat.

https://electionlawblog.org/?p=149391
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
It's not that complex. She works for Trump and her word means nothing.

I guess maybe it's a little trickier here, since she wasn't lying FOR Trump, but probably not much.
jackjjackson · 70-79, M
Really? You’re going with this? If her family votes in TX it hurts you. If her family votes in HI it helps you. Oh the Hawaiian homestead language in the Hi law only applies to those choosing the Hi homestead election. My my. You’ve become quite the partisan. When the dims were in control you were more open minded. Was that an act? @MistyCee
@jackjjackson I'm just not inclined to believe anything a Trumpist says, tbh.

It might be actually be a mistake, and of course, what does one vote matter?

My point is that when she took the job, she pretty much forfeited any benefit of a doubt in my book about her honesty.
jackjjackson · 70-79, M
Tip. Name calling doesn’t make you look smart.

She’s doing a great job and you can’t dispute that so just name call.

Oh you will want to take a look at this. Cannot deny it even if you ignore yesterdays market.
@jackjjackson Look at what?

I saw the stock market, the bond market, etc. Are you saying Tulsi had something to do with that?
jackjjackson · 70-79, M
Her boss and the lieutenants together of which she is one. @MistyCee
@jackjjackson So do you think she made money when Trump manipulated the market?
@MistyCee Alas, Mr Jackson lost too many debates to me and chose to block me. Otherwise I would love to participate in this debate. But you're doing great, crushing him MC!!