Which was worse? No Child Left Behind, or the Affordable Care Act?
Poll - Total Votes: 9
No Child Left Behind
Affordable Care Act
You can only vote on one answer.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Subsumedpat · 36-40, M
I would not get too carried away being happy about getting rid of it, if we did not have medicare but had insurance instead I think we would just let the old people die. That is the way it used to be you know. The health-insurance industry is designed to make a profit, not provide medical care. You simply cannot make money by insuring high-risk pools such as old people without charging very high premiums. Economically you can not beat economy of scale, no way an insurance company can get the same price for a knee used in a knee replacement buying 80,000 that a single payer could buying 600,000 a year.
If you look around the world at the way others do it you will find that some form of single payer system is the most economical and the most beneficial to the most people. We insure about 55 million Americans this way already so don't act like it is some socialist invention.
If you look around the world at the way others do it you will find that some form of single payer system is the most economical and the most beneficial to the most people. We insure about 55 million Americans this way already so don't act like it is some socialist invention.
GohantheThird · M
It is much easier to ammend what is already there rather than repeal it and give us no replacement.
Subsumedpat · 36-40, M
No it is not because the parts people want to keep are reliant on parts they want to get rid of for funding. We need to start all over and get a consensus of what we want to accomplish and have that supported by both parties. Nothing else is going to work if one side forces a solution down the others throat no matter what that solution is it won't stick and won't work. We need to look around the world and find what works best for us.
GohantheThird · M
@Subsumedpat: Fair enough, but starting over could make the problem worse. What about people who have insurance via ACA?
Subsumedpat · 36-40, M
@XamadtheFirst: That is a very difficult problem especially when you consider some of those people had plans which got done away with because they did not fully comply with the ACA or were done away with because they offered benefits great enough to qualify for additional taxes and were replaced by insurance under the ACA. With that you had people who had insurance, lost it because of government legislation then received it again under ACA and now are going to loose it again. All the more reason to not pass a law supported only by one side and even then it just squeaked by.