Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

This wasted TWO BILLION DOLLARS could have bought a lot of school lunches

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/stacey-abrams-slammed-after-defending-2-billion-biden-era-epa-funds-buy-green-energy-appliances

Stacey Abrams slammed after defending $2 billion in Biden-era EPA funds to buy green energy appliances

Failed Democratic Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams is facing condemnation from conservatives after she appeared on MSNBC to defend a $2 billion initiative under the Biden administration's EPA to purchase green energy appliances for Americans.

"Stacey Abrams linked Power Forward Communities received $2 billion in tax dollars in 2024 after reporting just $100 in revenue the year before. They were so unqualified that the grant agreement required the NGO to complete ‘How to Develop a Budget’ training within 90 days," EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in comment provided to Fox Digital on Sunday.


How could you people support this CRIMINAL who ripped off the taxpayers while poor school children go hungry every day?
Top | New | Old
BlueVeins · 22-25
Map of states creating free school lunches programs

[media=https://frac.org/blog/free-healthy-school-meals-for-all-policies]

IDC one way or the other but wasn't she the minority leader in the state of GA? I don't think she can unilaterally instate a school lunches program.
Reason10 · 70-79, M
@BlueVeins She WASTED money that could have been part of a FEDERAL school lunch program. So she RIPPED OFF THE STUDENTS AND THE TAXPAYERS.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
TexChik · F
It was a quid-pro-quo deal to buy votes from low-income families with taxpayer-bought appliances.
Reason10 · 70-79, M
@TexChik And it could have bought a LOT of school lunches.
TexChik · F
@Reason10 Or food for the homeless. Anything but what it was earmarked for.
The Dems definitely pretend to be the left and yet serve corporatism.
The population tolerates it.
Vin53 · M
lmao...every appliance made today is listed green energy.
DonaldTrumpet · 70-79, M
DIsgracEfUL
cuDZ HaVEZ BouHgT a weekS WortHz Of Twinkie’s ForZ EverYz ChiLdZ
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
"green", low energy/energy saving, etc. appliances; aka smaller, weaker motors, and shittier electronics so they burn out faster than standard appliances...
MethDozer · M
How is this actually related to school lunches sir?
@MethDozer it's not. People voted to fund wars fully and not to fund society. The confusion is among people who think there was another choice in bipartisan politics. There's no other choice in the duopoly.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment