Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

State Department terminates U.S. support of Ukraine energy grid restoration

State Department terminates U.S. support of Ukraine energy grid restoration.

The USAID initiative had invested hundreds of millions of dollars in helping Ukraine's energy grid recover from attacks from Russia.

By Vaughn Hillyard/NBC News

WASHINGTON — The State Department this week terminated a U.S. Agency for International Development initiative that has invested hundreds of millions of dollars to help restore Ukraine's energy grid from attacks by the Russian military, according to two USAID officials working on the agency’s Ukraine mission.

Power outages have been applied overnight in some regions of Ukraine due to the attacks on energy facilities. The country’s systems have sustained near-constant impact throughout the course of the three-year war.

It significantly undercuts this administration’s abilities to negotiate on the ceasefire, and it’d signal to Russia that we don’t care about Ukraine or our past investments,” one USAID official involved in the Ukraine mission told NBC News.

The official continued: “Russia is fighting a two-pronged war in Ukraine: A military one but also an economic one. They’re trying to crush the economy, but USAID has played a central role in helping it be resilient, [including] shoring up the energy grid…We’ve provided vast amount of support to the Ukrainian government to avoid a macro economic crisis.”

In addition to ending the Ukraine Energy Security Project, USAID is also dramatically downsizing its presence in Ukraine.

Before the Trump administration’s latest moves, 64 American government employees and contractors were serving on the ground in Ukraine for the agency. Just eight of those personnel are slated to remain on the ground in the war-torn country after the Trump administration placed its remaining global workforce on administrative leave and ordered those workers not deemed “critical” to return to the U.S.

The two officials warned that USAID withdrawing from Ukraine would leave its energy grid vulnerable in the heart of the winter as it endures assaults from further Russian missiles.

A State Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
Wait until they start funding Russia.
@CountScrofula I see the Russiagate Manchurian Candidate conspiracy crowd is still going strong.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I don't watch liberals like Rachel Maddow, I'm just reading the politics of the situation.

The US is abandoning liberalism and its natural alliance with other liberal states like the EU. The Trump regime is obviously sympathetic to Russia, and hostile to Ukraine.

The US is also an arms-dealing nation. Who is that top customer gonna be if it's no longer Ukraine?

This isn't paranoia. I'm an observer. I don't have a dog in this fight.
@CountScrofula I believe you but statements like that are the sort of thing American liberals are known for.


The "alliance" with the EU has nothing to do with liberalism. It goes back to the American colonial project in Europe. As far as the Americans have been concerned since 1945 they purchased the sovereignty of Europe. Full stop.


They are not "pro Russian". But pro Russian has become code for acknowledging objective reality in Ukraine and not blindly parroting American and Ukrainian propaganda uncritically.

Most of which can be debunked with basic logic.

As for who will be the top customer? All that military equipment of Europe that was sent to be destroyed in Ukraine and Kursk. They need to buy new toys.

And Trump for whatever reason wants a war with China so that will be WAY bigger money. The US defense budget is scheduled to approach 1 trillion dollars.

Even if they re-arm all of Europe it will be a drop in the bucket.

And Russia alternates between the 2nd and 3rd largest arms dealing nation. They don't need American weapons.

In fact Western weapons are a scam. Billions of dollars spent with mediocre performance and zero capability to produce anything in large quantities.

Did you know that if the US went to war with a peer nation that could strike the homeland it would only take bombing 2 factories to completely kill the US capability of producing tanks and artillery?

There is exactly one factory that makes M1 Abrams tanks and I don't think they have built a single new tank since the early 2000s. They only deal in upgrade packages for existing vehicles now.

And there is exactly 1 factory that makes all the gun barrels for the M1 tanks and all their artillery both self propelled and towed.
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow No man when I mean pro-Russian I mean that without any kind of hidden implication. Trump is pro-Russian. Obviously. Loudly. He shouts it to the skies.

This is not because he's a puppet of Putin. It's because he's a corrupt reactionary and Russia is a much closer fit to his vision to the US than the EU.

And the US colonial project is neoliberalism. That's the whole thing. Ukraine is a part of that. The entire reason this war started is because NATO (and NATO means the US) tried to pull Ukraine into its sphere of influence, and Russia felt backed into a corner and invaded.

The neolibs - that is Republicans and Democrats from Reagan to today - all back this kind of project. Trump does not, and that means a geopolitical realignment.

You're trying to characterize me as someone who is all FREEDOM GOOD RUSSIA BAD and I think all these characters are monsters who should be put up against the wall. But I can see what's happening and that is a wholesale abandonment of neoliberalism by the US in favour of something much weirder.

And in that weird future, Russia is no longer an adversary.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment