Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Let your imagination run riot . . . how much do you think LA’s “water chief” is paid?



Photo above - no, this is NOT a supermodel. She's the Los Angeles "water chief". Because looks are more important than talent?

What would you (as a taxpayer) be willing to pay the “water chief” in your city? Before you answer, let’s put some context around this:

- A US senator earns $175,000

- California’s Governor (Newsom) earns $201,000 a year (the highest of any governor)

- The Mayor of Los Angeles apparently outranks the governor, and earns $281,000

- President Joseph Robinette Biden earns $400,000 a year

Okay – ready to proceed? How much does the Los Angele’s “water chief” get paid?

You’re wrong. It’s THREE QUARTERS OF A MILLION DOLLARS - $750,000 a year (see link below). About double what we pay “the leader of the free world”.

Water woman's name is Janisse Quinones, and she was hired by Mayor Bass less than a year ago. It’s not clear if Bass and Quinones were personally acquainted before she began banking her awesome $750,000 salary, but you can’t rule it out.

Now for the fun part. Water czar Quinones knew – for months – that the Santa Ynez reservoir was “closed for repairs”. In fact, she’s the one who closed it! In the middle of brushfire season!

Where do we find diligent and highly skilled public servants like Ms. Quinones? It's apparently quite easy - Janisse was previously an SVP with Pacific Gas and Electric – the utility that actually CAUSES California brushfires. You absolutely cannot stuff like this up.

Quinones should be fired on the spot. Mayor Bass should resign in shame. Joe Biden should stop promising that taxpayers will rebuild Hollywood celebrity mansions for free. If your policy was discontinued, it's on YOU to get a replacement policy, Paris Hilton!

I’m just sayin’ . . .

LA water chief knew about empty reservoir, broken hydrants months before fires: Report
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
The firefighter's union was complaining that they were underfunded, at least since May. Around 80 fire engines and trucks (engines pump water, trucks carry ladders and other things) were out of commission as the city couldn't afford repairs. People complain about "big government," then complain when the government isn't big enough to do what they want. As has been widely reported, funding for the fire department was shifted to the police, because people are more worried about crime than fires.

Should they have hired this lady at that salary? She's a C-suite executive, so they probably had to pay her a competitive rate. I think we can assume she didn't close the reservoir just for fun; it probably does need repairs that the city can't afford if they can't afford mechanics to keep their equipment running. The LA fire department responds to half a million emergencies of various types annually. They have fewer employees than they did 15 years ago, while demand has gone up 50%. At some point, "doing more with less" isn't possible.

Meanwhile, millionaires build houses on hillsides that have burned regularly since human beings first inhabited this area. Controlled burns are one way to manage this, but people don't like them when they're right next to where they live. The only solution might be private industry. If people can't get insurance (which we're seeing in Florida), they won't be able to build in those areas. As for the federal government stepping in, some shitbag Republican Congressman has proposed halting funding for California until they end Democratic policies. Sounds great! And the next time a hurricane ravages Texas, Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, or Florida, I say no funding until they legalize abortion.
Jokersswild · 22-25VIP
@LeopoldBloom
People complain about "big government," then complain when the government isn't big enough to do what they want.

Exactly!