Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Kamala Harris Should Run in 2028. Trump did something no president has done since Cleveland. But Harris can do something no VP has done since Nixon.

Flipping less than 3/4 of 1% of the votes in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania would have resulted in a Kamala Harris victory on election night!

Donald Trump won the electoral college, 312 to 226.

Wisconsin (10 Electoral Votes)
1,697,626
1,668,229
-------------
Margin 29,397
Flip 14,699 votes from Trump to Harris and Harris wins Wisconsin.


Michigan (15 Electoral Votes)
2,816,636
2,736,533
-------------
Margin 80,103
Flip 40,052 votes from Trump to Harris and Harris wins Michigan.


Pennsylvania (19 Electoral Votes)
3,543,308
3,423,042
-------------
Margin 120,266
Flip 60,134 votes from Trump to Harris and Harris wins Pennsylvania.


So, flipping 114,885 votes from Harris to Trump in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania (0.723% out of 15,885,374 cast for those two candidates in those three states) would have resulted in Harris winning the presidency.

Flipping less than 3/4 of 1% of the votes in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania would have resulted in a Harris victory on election night!

That's anything but a Trump landslide.

In 1960, John Kennedy defeated Richard Nixon 303 to 219 in the Electoral College (58.05% of the EC's votes between them).

Kennedy won the popular vote, 34,220,984 to 34,108,157 (two person total of 68,329,141). That's a margin of 112,827 between them, or 0.165%. #

Trump won the electoral college, 312 to 226. That's 57.99% of the EC's votes between then, meaning that Harris did better in the Electoral College against Trump than Nixon did against Kennedy!

Trump's popular vote victory, 2,288,383 (77,297,721 to 75,009,336), was by a margin of 1.50% of the 152,307,059 votes cast for either Trump or Harris.

So while Trump did something no president has done since Grover Cleveland (losing the presidency and winning it back), Harris can do something no vice president has done since Richard Nixon (losing the general election but winning it in a subsequent election).

---

# Kennedy only edged Nixon in the popular vote if you consider those Alabama unpledged Democrat electors who voted for him.

* The vote as per the Associated Press, December 19, 2024.



About Me:
https://similarworlds.com/beckyromero/info

Comprehensive Analysis of My Voting History, Political and National Security Positions:
https://similarworlds.com/politics/5213067-Comprehensive-Analysis-of-Becky-Romeros-Political-Views

Index of My Stories and Questions:
https://similarworlds.com/813725-I-White-Board/2509132-Index-of-All-My-Stories-and-Questions-The-topics


This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Losers console themselves with statistics. 🤣😂🤣
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@jackjjackson

One hundred sixteen wins in 1906, buddy! No one has topped that since! May that be a lesson to you!

You proved my point. You had to go back more than a century to console yourself. @beckyromero
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@jackjjackson
You proved my point. You had to go back more than a century to console yourself.

Are you forget who won the next two World Series in a row after 1906.

Those who do not understand statistics are condemned with extra homework.
Gibbon · 70-79, M
@beckyromero Statistics are just a tool of measurement. I used them my entire working life. They can also be manipulated to satisfy managements desires. That's understanding statistics.
More than a century ago. Desperation. @beckyromero
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@jackjjackson

What Trump did was the first time since 1892.

What Harris can try would be the first since 1968 and only second time in history.

Incumbent vice presidents who lost a presidential general election, then ran and won as a former vice president:

1960 (lost) ... 1968 (won) Richard Nixon

Nixon is also the only Incumbent vice president who lost a presidential general election and then ran again as a former vice president and received his/hers party nomination.
Gibbon · 70-79, M
@beckyromero You really need to start a campaign now and push her into it. We will be eternally grateful.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Gibbon

I'm already onboard the train.
Gibbon · 70-79, M
@beckyromero Good. You're on the train to nowhere. I'm a bit shocked your intelligence is failing you. Everyone jumping up and down excited supporting that empty suit shouting she can win deserves it all over again. Becky she's an intellectual ghost.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Gibbon

I'd rather back a candidate in 2028 who I believe in and who came extremely close to winning than one with no name.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Harris won’t be the candidate and whoever is won’t beat Vance. You know that. 12 years of Trump Vance get used to it. @beckyromero
The dims are fortunately for patriotic US citizens are getting dimmer post election and pre inauguration. @Gibbon
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@jackjjackson @Gibbon

And still no names.
As of today Whitmer has a greater. Than two times better chance than Harris. @beckyromero