This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
LeopoldBloom · M
A constitutional convention is a terrible idea as it would involve one side barely winning while imposing its ideology on the other barely losing side. It doesn’t even matter which side “wins,” we’d have violence that would make the Syrian civil war look like an argument between kindergartners.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@LeopoldBloom
There should be a Consitutional amendment that abolishes that specific option (i.e. a "convention") as a means of changing the Constitution.
There should be a Consitutional amendment that abolishes that specific option (i.e. a "convention") as a means of changing the Constitution.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@LeopoldBloom yup. Americans seem far too violent to risk democracy. They'll really amp up the killing if they begin to function, right?
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Roundandroundwego
The Constitution is far too vague about how a Constitutional Convention would work. Which is probably why we haven't had one since the Constitution was written.
The Constitution is far too vague about how a Constitutional Convention would work. Which is probably why we haven't had one since the Constitution was written.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@beckyromero a document prevents you from functioning! Wow. Unbelievable.