Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Las Vegas Sun Endorses Harris and Assesses Trump as Mentally Ill

The Las Vegas Sun, the swing states widest circulated news outlet, just endorsed Kamala Harris for president and issued a scathing assessment of Trump's mental decline.

The newspaper warned in an editorial published Wednesday that not only does Trump’s "racism, sexism, xenophobia” and more make him totally “unfit for any public office” but that his “mental acuity and sharpness are also in decline.”

“The nation must confront the fact that beyond his hateful character, he is crippled cognitively and showing clear signs of mental illness,” its board wrote, providing multiple examples of Trump’s “fragility.”
Trump “has never had the moral compass to lead this country,” the newspaper concluded. “But even his supporters cannot afford to ignore the signs that he may no longer have the mental faculties to lead it either. The stakes are simply too high.”
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
pdockal · 56-60, M
Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't the greenspuns (who own the paper) adimentally against Trump ?????
MoveAlong · 70-79, M
@pdockal Yes, but it's rare for their editorial endorsements to be picked up by national and international media outlets.
pdockal · 56-60, M
@MoveAlong

Your missing the point
The media is CONTROLLED by them so i doubt it's UNBIASED
MoveAlong · 70-79, M
@pdockal It doesn't mean it's not true. And that goes for both sides.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@pdockal Any endorsement of anything is biased... that's the whole point of an endorsement.
pdockal · 56-60, M
@newjaninev2

Not from the owner of the paper controlling the narrative
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@pdockal The bias is inherent regardless of its origin... an endorsement is a preference and a recommendation, and that automatically brings the question 'whose?'

A newspaper company isn't animate... it can't have a preference.
pdockal · 56-60, M
@newjaninev2

Your still missing the point
But then again you'll never get the point
You'll always believe the propsganda
Especially since you keep defending the bias of the paper