This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
jackjjackson · M
Funny desperation math
beckyromero · 36-40, FVIP
@jackjjackson
You can't make your own math equations. Any more than you can make up your own facts.
There are more female voters in EVERY STATE than male voters. And women are more likely to vote than men.
If Kamala Harris' edge in voters from female voters ends up equal or larger than Donald Trump's edge in votes from male voters in any given state, she will win the electoral votes of that state. Plain and simple.*
If you can't understand 3rd grade math, then you need to throw away (better yet, recycle them) your Trump University math home study courses and go back to a REAL school.
-----
* Maine and Nebraska allocate one electoral vote per the winner of each Congressional district, with two electoral votes to the overall popular vote winner
You can't make your own math equations. Any more than you can make up your own facts.
There are more female voters in EVERY STATE than male voters. And women are more likely to vote than men.
If Kamala Harris' edge in voters from female voters ends up equal or larger than Donald Trump's edge in votes from male voters in any given state, she will win the electoral votes of that state. Plain and simple.*
If you can't understand 3rd grade math, then you need to throw away (better yet, recycle them) your Trump University math home study courses and go back to a REAL school.
-----
* Maine and Nebraska allocate one electoral vote per the winner of each Congressional district, with two electoral votes to the overall popular vote winner
jackjjackson · M
Desperate. Professional pollers and even the Harris campaign knows that. Their numbers make sense yours are make believe. You’re a hack Romero. @beckyromero
beckyromero · 36-40, FVIP
@jackjjackson
Those ARE polling numbers, you thick-headed Trumpet.
Their numbers make sense yours are make believe
Those ARE polling numbers, you thick-headed Trumpet.
jackjjackson · M
No they’re you’re self satisfying adjustments to real polls where your adjustments have already been taken into account. Your claim is phony. AS USUAL. you’re a dim hack Romero. @beckyromero
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
jackjjackson · M
Tinkering with the real poll totals to make real total numbers SEEM to help you when they don’t is a sign of a dishonest political hack. @beckyromero