The Overton Window
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow
I spent 3 minutes reading the main website for this "theory", and noticed it is a mostly right wing "theory", and Glen Beck ever wrote a book on it.
It appears to be in the domain of propositional logic, and links assertions with a range of acceptability of assertions the pulkic will accept in a spectrum. I haven't seen what evidence exists for how this spectrum is established other than they fall in the middle of two extremes within a domain that contradict.
Is this really what you are so excited about? I can give you some titles to some books on propositional logic. My two favorites are Aristotle's square and Dignaga's circle. Both use a far more complex theory than the Overton Window. Both produced commentators who massively built upon them. And neither sit on the left vs right spectrum. Others exist too. You should get into the history of it and not merely embrace some pop theory built upon them.
I spent 3 minutes reading the main website for this "theory", and noticed it is a mostly right wing "theory", and Glen Beck ever wrote a book on it.
It appears to be in the domain of propositional logic, and links assertions with a range of acceptability of assertions the pulkic will accept in a spectrum. I haven't seen what evidence exists for how this spectrum is established other than they fall in the middle of two extremes within a domain that contradict.
Is this really what you are so excited about? I can give you some titles to some books on propositional logic. My two favorites are Aristotle's square and Dignaga's circle. Both use a far more complex theory than the Overton Window. Both produced commentators who massively built upon them. And neither sit on the left vs right spectrum. Others exist too. You should get into the history of it and not merely embrace some pop theory built upon them.