B Obama’s latest Harris speeches are directed to Blacks telling them the MUST vote for Harris SOLEY because Harris is black 😀

@Bhs123 And vice presidents are in charge of all commodity prices??

@ElwoodBlues yes because biden was messed-up for yrs so she was running it

@ElwoodBlues you loose

@Bhs123 says Oh, so PRESIDENTS are in control of all commodity prices? Capitalism doesn't exist??

@Bhs123

Ellie does not know a lot of things.

When Ellie thought Biden was going to be the 2024 nominee, he didn't know Biden was cognitively impaired.

Now that Kamala is the nominee, he doesn't know that she's an airhead.

The ONE thing Ellie knows for sure is that he slavishly supports the Democrat, no matter what. 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

Harris:

CASE CLOSED

@ElwoodBlues @Thinkerbell @Bhs123

Those prices increases are fact. The dem lib comments regarding that fact are LIES. Simple. Patriotic US citizen taxpayers know that. @Bhs123

Woody doesn’t know why tho 😂😂😂 @Thinkerbell

@Thinkerbell Actually, what I said, repeatedly, was that Biden was the lesser of two evils. And it's still true.

@ElwoodBlues

You insisted, for example, that there was nothing wrong with Biden wandering off from a group of G7 leaders to give a thumbs up to a sky diver who had landed some minutes earlier (and who paid Biden no mind as he repacked his parachute), instead of paying attention to the parachutist that was landing right in front of the group that very second. The Italian PM had to drag Biden back. 😂🤣

And is Kamala also "the lesser of two evils"?
Or is she just hunky-dory? 😂🤣

@ElwoodBlues

Is Kamala also "the lesser of two evils," Ellie?

You neglected to say. 😂🤣

@Bhs123 “you loose”

Lol!

That’s your substantive rebuttal? I’ll give that it was slighter better than Harris could have done 😂😂😂 @trollslayer

@jackjjackson

Kamala would have said, " I was raised in a middle-class family, and I'm laughing out loud because out loud laughing is what we need to do to preserve the core value of laughter for the benefit of the middle class."

@Thinkerbell Thank you, I DID neglect to say; let me address that question now.
We know Harris hasn't bankrupted 4 casinos!
We know Harris hasn't been convicted of sex assault!
We know Harris hasn't been convicted of 34 felonies!
We know Harris hasn't been forced to shut down her own fraudulent university and pay $25 MILLION to the students!

And then there's the debate. In the debate Harris was cool, collected and authoritative. And she demonstrated how EASY it is to manipulate Trump. A few comments about crowd sizes was all it took to make Trump angry, defensive, and off topic for the rest of the debate. Harris demonstrated Trump's childish inability to manage his own emotions.

Based on these and similar facts, I'm saying Yes, Harris is ALSO the lesser of two evils.

Kind of short don’t you think? That could be rephrased at least a couple of more times 😂😂😂 @Thinkerbell

@ElwoodBlues

Well, I'm glad we're making a wee bit of progress with you, Ellie, getting you to admit that Kamala is an evil.

But HOW evil?

Given that she shares responsibility with Biden for letting in 10 million+ illegals, some 100,000 of whom (at a minimum) are criminals, she is at least partly responsible for every murder, rape, assault, robbery, child trafficking and drug dealing offense committed by these criminals that would otherwise not have happened, had the Trump restrictions on border crossings remained in place. This alone makes Kamala/Biden FAR more evil than Trump ever was.

@jackjjackson

Yeah, it is kinda short, but life is too short to compose a full-blown Kamala word salad.

@Thinkerbell Nice try. It's an idiom, not to be taken literally. Kinda like "four corners of the Earth."

But, since you wanna talk border, truth is our border problems are due to antiquated immigration laws that Congress refuses to fix. For decades, US immigration law and policy was designed to spit in the eye of Fidel Castro by treating everyone who set foot on Florida as an asylum seeker. This helped earn votes from a swing demographic in a swing state. I agree, we need immigration reform.

Read what Republican Representative from Texas Chip Roy said.

"I saw former President Trump make that allegation earlier today on one of his social media posts. 'All the president has to do is declare the borders closed and it's closed.' Well, with all due respect, that didn't happen in 2017, 18, 19, and 20. There were millions of people who came into the United States during those four years and Trump stopped very very few of them despite his lies."

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4452898-chip-roy-donald-trump-border/

@ElwoodBlues

What Chip Roy (and of course you, Ellie) conveniently fail to mention is that the "millions of people who came into the United States" under Trump was absolutely dwarfed (by a factor of 3 or more) by the number who came in under Biden, whose first order of business was to rescind practically all of Trump's executive orders that were in place. Trump's border policies were, of course, opposed at every turn by Democrats and some Republicans like Roy. I don't know what Roy's special interest may be (aside from disliking Trump), but it wouldn't surprise me at all if he represents business interests that want the cheap immigrant labor.


Meanwhile, your "lesser of two evils" candidate Kamala belatedly agrees that there is indeed a border problem that needs to be "fixed." I can just imagine the kind of "fix" she will push for, when and if she gets into office. 🙄

@Thinkerbell And what you conveniently fail to mention is that we are hobbled and constrained by antiquated immigration laws from the Reagan era that Congress refuses to fix. Under those laws, people can walk up to any customs station, request asylum, and, by law, have their case considered. Barriers deserts don't matter. Refugee classifications are what matter. The whole premise of a "big beautiful wall" is just a fairytale to fool low information voters.

Our antiquated immigration laws create a giant loophole for asylum seekers. As I mentioned, It's a holdover from the '60s & '70s. However, the Senate Bipartisan border bill would have closed that loophole (or greatly shrunk it) and others. It was the first immigration overhaul since Reagan gave amnesty in 1986.

And of course you know what happened to he Senate Bipartisan border bill. tRump leaned on his flunkies to kill it. tRump wanted a mess on the border to run against. You can glibly say oh, bad bad bill, but it never got debated - no chance for fixes and amendments to be proposed - the whole legislative process for the bill was halted for the convenience of the tRump campaign.

And so we're still stuck with the antiquated 1986 immigration bill with it's asylum loophole.

BTW, @Thinkerbell, your graph is "border encounters." What does that mean? It doesn't sound like the same thing as "asylum requesters allowed entry while their cases are considered."