Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Would you trust this guy to replace our CIA Intelligence?

Poll - Total Votes: 5
Julianne Assange is a better source.
The CIA has it all over this guy.
Who knows who has better intelligence.
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.

Are you Gellin'?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
Julian Assage is a complex figure who inspires mixed feelings, though ultimately he has been a source for good because he has made power more accountable and made people aware of the tech security state(s)*. He has paid a high price for it now and is still stuck at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London even after all these years.

Glenn Greenwald, the Guardian journalist who Snowden first contacted, writes excellent stuff for the Intercept and people should check it out.

*Not just America. Britain (a US puppet state in terms foreign policy - and I say that as a Brit) has GCHQ, which has done exactly the same.
Pfuzylogic · M
@Burnley123:

I do find the CIA as a cop didn't intelligence agency. They did miss use their power as a political instrument for Bush in the invasion of Iraq with this concept of WMD. It seems that they did generate false intelligence.

I personally find Obama with a level of integrity that is above those type of maneuvers. It was obvious that the FBI was a tool for Trump and Giuliani and that they intentionally disrupted the election. Giuliani called it out a week before actually happened as his personal gratifying show off move.

I don't trust the results of the election I do think that it was rigged but I do believe that more rigging was done by Trump and the attorney generals of North Carolina Pennsylvania and Ohio all three of which had Republican attorney general's which were trimming the voter rolls.

Thank you for the information though that you had of the person that writes in correlation with Julian Assange.