How the media of Omissions is going to cover for her

@NerdyPotato very few? smh

@Gibbon Harris, AOC, Sanders. That's pretty much it. The democratic party as a whole is medium right for international standards.

@NerdyPotato So are you saying she's that far left. That's even worse.

@Gibbon no, she's medium left. That is far for USA standards, but it's not extreme by any means.

@NerdyPotato your first comment is now even more confusing. I'm done

@Gibbon it's ok, you're not alone. I've noticed that a lot of republicans don't understand what leftism means.

@NerdyPotato maybe you should give some open minded thought to why that might be

@Gibbon probably because Republicans are against education about topics they don't like. 🤷

@Gibbon like what? And have you been educated about that yourself or are you just assuming it's bad without knowing anything about it?

@Gibbon so you don't know what you're opposing. Got it!

@NerdyPotato I absolutely do however it's another rabbit hole involving gender that to me is an immoral fued. Try as you may you're not getting me to go into those subjects here. Thanks for the assistance with my notifications issues by the way.

@Gibbon you're welcome about the notification issues. But the fact you call the complexity of gender immoral tells me you don't understand it.

@NerdyPotato it means I don't and won't agree with it.

@Gibbon that's the problem: the complexity of sex, gender and attraction exists. It's not a matter of opinion whether those are binary. They aren't. There is nothing to agree or disagree with there. If you think all those are simple choices, that shows you don't even know the basics of it and have formed an opinion based on assumptions rather than facts.

@Gibbon yep, maybe you should dive at least a little below the survive before judging. It's not a conspiracy rabbit hole where nothing makes sense and everything contradicts each others. It's just objective science.

@NerdyPotato let's start educating them when they're 3 years old. Science BS Thankfully a small population.

@Gibbon nobody is proposing that, and science isn't BS. But thanks for stating once again you have no clue what you're opposed against.