Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Anyone for a Kamala Harris- Hillary Clinton Presidential Run?

I love how all the dems were avoiding posts about who would be Kamala Harris' running mate a few days ago. A complete about face, absolute and immediate acceptance of Biden leaving, best thing in the world, he is a amazing for doing it.

Harris was polling WORST than Biden in the last few polls. People despise her, and given Biden has been mentally out of it his whole Presidency, there is a good chance Harris was leading and reaponsible for most of his policies. Hard to really say who was in charge, but it wasn't Biden, and if it wasn't the President the expectation is the VP and Sectratery of Defense steps up to the plate. So if Kamala starts distancing herself from all of Biden's policies, saying it wasn't her, historians are going to have a real problem in identifying what was happening in the Biden White House.

One big name I've seen creeping more and more into the spotlight last few weeks is Hillary Clinton. Wasn't at first as VP. No, she has just suddenly been popping up more and more giving her irrelevant opinion on things. Now I'm hearing her name dropped as VP canidate.

Kamala, with lower poll numbers than Biden, and the witch of a woman who Trump already beat in a election. What is that? And you know if somehow it works (it so won't), Kamala is having a unbelievable accident. Fast. And it will be untraceable to President Hillary.

I'm trying to imagine what established politician on the Left Kamala can tap that can turn swing states. Whitmer is hated in Michigan. Josh Shapiro of Pa isn't hated here but is new as a Governor, and Kamala Harris looks like a crash and burn presidential candidate, doubt he will quit being governor to jump on this wagon train. Newsom can't win in swing states, has a terrible track record in California, the dialogue built up around him in liberal bubbles doesn't translate well with independents, who definately do not want their state to collapse into a larger version of San Francisco.

So Hillary, as absurd as it sounds, is somewhat credible. Bill is probably cringing at the thought lf having to go through another campaign. One deeply unlikely to result in a win. I hope Anthony Weiner makes a surprise appearance if Hillary runs.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@Dignaga says
the only remaining true Nazis left on the planet live in New Berlin in Wisconsin- they are direct descendants of the Nazis Embassy in Washington DC that Hitler recognized
So who are these people with swastika flags that keep showing up at Trump rallies? What makes you able to classify them better than they classify themselves??










One of the things that's appalling to me is how often swastika bearing folks are tolerated at demonstrations for Trump. It's horrifying that self-described Amerfican patriots SILENTLY ASSENT to Nazis in their midst. Repeatedly, @Dignaga
@ElwoodBlues Those people don't even know their own ideological history. KKK and Nazis historically hated each other, KKK back when democrats dominated the south used to hunt dkwn Nazis, and were enthusiastic for Roosevelt and enlisted en masse for WW2. Nazis obviously did not want to go overseas to fight other Nazis.

The phenomena you are seeing is the direct result, since shortly after WW2, of the left trying (unsuccessfully) to distance itself from Nazis policies and ideology by labeling it a right wing movement, which is a terminology borrowed from French Socialism and Marxist-Leninism which wanted to blame Capitalism for the rise of the Nazis Empire and not as a spinoff of the European left.

The Neo-Nazis groups and the KKK don't attract the brightest people, and after three generations of being called the right by the left, they accepted the terminolgy of the left and call themselves right, but they usually just get into fights with conservatives who look at them like two headed aliens from mars. They show up to pick whatever support they can. If you look at thier literature, they are strongly pro-abortion, pro-eugenics, want liberal socialism as a ethnic volk, and kften support the free love movement. People forget the Fascist Movement began as a arts oriented hippy movment. The very first place that instituted fascism was The Free State of Fiume immediately at the end of WW1, and it was a hippy movement of free love.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_State_of_Fiume

Lead by Gabriele D’Annunzio, this silly fuck:



Yes, he was the first to institute Fascism, was a hippy, and free love advocate, made a constitution based around the Ubermensch and the principles of music. The modern Hippy Movement descends from it. He moved back to Italy and served under mussolini.

That's why the Nazis Elites were having orgies all the time and doing drugs. They were a liberal movement. That's why the Neo-Nazis in America have orgies and run meth labs, and have their own secret music and religious rituals. But most are superficially aware of it until they start reading into it. Many are indoctrinated in Prisons and join right into Communist Parties after getting out, it's a very simple ideological transition, pretty much everything is the same, heck they can even still hate on the Jews (Karl Marx hated Jews).

It's a leftist movement. The left just labels them as right because of european propaganda. And I don't think the KKK crowd is very much aware of their conservative democratic party roots at this point, they are a even smaller movement and they don't seem the book reading type. Nazis have a deeper literature to dig into from two continents going back to the 19th century, and their ideas are actively discussed and apllauded by the modern left, so when they do turn intellectual they have more to dig through.

As a conservative I hate both. It has nothing to do with conservatives. It's a phenomena of the left.
@Dignaga says
the left trying (unsuccessfully) to distance itself from Nazis policies and ideology by labeling it a right wing movement
WRONG!!

They were a liberal movement. That's why the Neo-Nazis in America have orgies and run meth labs, and have their own secret music and religious rituals.

Actions speak louder than words, and NAZI actions were anti-socialist, destroying unions and privatizing industry. Need details?

On May 2, 1933, Adolf Hitler’s storm troopers occupied all trade union headquarters across Germany, and union leaders were arrested and put in prison or concentration camps. Many were beaten and tortured. All of the unions’ funds – in other words, the workers’ money – were confiscated. Former union officials were put on blacklists, preventing them from finding work.

The Great Depression had spurred increased state ownership in most Western capitalist countries. This also took place in Germany during the last years of the Weimar Republic.[41] However, after the Nazis took power, industries were privatized en masse. Several banks, shipyards, railway lines, shipping lines, welfare organizations, and more were privatized.[42] The Nazi government took the stance that enterprises should be in private hands wherever possible.[43] State ownership was to be avoided unless it was absolutely necessary for rearmament or the war effort, and even in those cases "the Reich often insisted on the inclusion in the contract of an option clause according to which the private firm operating the plant was entitled to purchase it."[43]

In short: Hitler hated unions and loved privately owned industry - the polar opposite of a socialist!!!





KKK back when democrats dominated the south used to hunt dkwn Nazis, and were enthusiastic for Roosevelt
I'm betting you'll be unable to document this. The south was strongly anti-interventionist until Pearl Harbor. There's a book
Terror in the Night: The Klan's Campaign Against the Jews by Jack Nelson
that shows the KKK and the Nazis had a similar white power agenda. Also, look for connections between the KKK and the German-American Bund. There was a rally held at the Bund's NJ compound 'Camp Nordland' where a joint meeting between members of the Bund and the KKK - bedecked in their "regalia" - occurred on August 18, 1940. The organizers claimed 3,500 attendees; others put the total closer to 1000. Regardless, the Bund (American Nazis) and the KKK were friendly, NOT opposed.

In short, my data says the KKK was by no means anti-Nazi, and you've provided no data to support your claim.

Most of the rest of your screed suffers from the logical fallacy of false equivalence; for example assuming that every group of people who get naked together share the same ideology. Pure sillyness!!

And, again, Hitler hated unions and actually privatized state owned industry - the polar opposite of a socialist!!!
@ElwoodBlues No, I'm right. Been doing philosophy and history for quite some time.
@Dignaga Actions speak louder than words, and NAZI actions were anti-socialist, destroying unions and privatizing industry - the POLAR OPPOSITE of socialism!!