This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
It's not simple or easy to negotiate peace with your enemies. Obviously the excuses are always adequate and war is the only choice for murkans.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Roundandroundwego
It would be EASY and SIMPLE for someone like you.
You'd just get down on your knees and surrender.
It would be EASY and SIMPLE for someone like you.
You'd just get down on your knees and surrender.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@beckyromero it's about me? Biggest war monger ever, eight hundred military bases - trying to engage Russia and China in war - but it's about my weakness. Sure.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@beckyromero how would you even know? I'm pretty sure my idea agrees with the UN. But that's all in the past, now that you're hegemon.
I understand Americans. Nobody would want to survive under that. And nobody can. Americans are the Final Solution to life.
I understand Americans. Nobody would want to survive under that. And nobody can. Americans are the Final Solution to life.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Roundandroundwego
From your past comments. You want Putin victorious in Ukraine. Now, apparently, you wish China victory over Taiwan. What other free countries do you wish to turn over to despots?
how would you even know?
From your past comments. You want Putin victorious in Ukraine. Now, apparently, you wish China victory over Taiwan. What other free countries do you wish to turn over to despots?
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@beckyromero hardly. But it's not like we can talk with you. Tell the West it's wrong? Nevah. You're unstoppable and not like humans. Peace is unfathomable for killers and Americans. And everyone understands that.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Roundandroundwego
Fine, then. Explain how you'd end the war in Ukraine. Explain what your China-Taiwan policy would be.
But all you can come up with is "negotiate peace."
That's nothing but empty words.
Someone like you is FAR WORSE than Neville Chamberlain. He might have said "peace for our time." But he never trusted Hitler and was hoping to bide time for Britain to prepare for war.
Fine, then. Explain how you'd end the war in Ukraine. Explain what your China-Taiwan policy would be.
But all you can come up with is "negotiate peace."
That's nothing but empty words.
Someone like you is FAR WORSE than Neville Chamberlain. He might have said "peace for our time." But he never trusted Hitler and was hoping to bide time for Britain to prepare for war.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@beckyromero it's already the law that you must negotiate and avoid wars. The international order is a problem because we've all given such fabulous wealth and effort to the murkans. They're gonna kill us all if they're not happy with our devotion to their ownership of all Nations and All Nature and all people. Sometimes it's easy to forget what might be better because US might us so fatal - so final solution, so world ending. Make the world safe for murka and we can forget everything else.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Roundandroundwego
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Can I buy you a plane ticket to Moscow so you can tell that to Vladimir Putin?
I've some some crazy cr@p written on SW, but that has to be the most ludicrous comment I've seen in years.
it's already the law that you must negotiate and avoid wars.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Can I buy you a plane ticket to Moscow so you can tell that to Vladimir Putin?
I've some some crazy cr@p written on SW, but that has to be the most ludicrous comment I've seen in years.
United Nations Charter
Article 51
Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
Article 51
Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@beckyromero I'm glad you understood what he said, because I tried and it still seems roundy posts meaningless waffle.