@SW-User why won’t Pedo Joe take a cognitive test? Why? Because he would fail miserably, so let’s compare, Trump aced his when he was in office, Biden refuses to take one, so I’ll put Trumps against Joe the pedo any day, and if you want to compare, how many times has Trump fell? Oh I know ZERO, how many times has your hero fallen? 4-5? And that’s just going up the stairs to Air Force one, let alone on the stage and off his bike. Biden can’t even remember what city or state he’s in , so let’s compare. https://youtu.be/DvA-Vf0MomM?si=8Fd2GjASk-NMbjS7 https://youtu.be/jQ5LzM9VHWQ?si=pgE27aWH5LpvLsuy
I was about to do a takedown of the “Pedo” accusation, but @DeWayfarer beat me to the punch. As far as the cognitive stuff? Well, it doesn’t get any more degenerative then snoozing through your very own criminal trial🤓😂
Legal proceedings that occurred later make it clear that the National File document came from Project Veritas. The Intercept reported in September 2022 that a Project Veritas employee provided the alleged diary to the National File in October 2020, when Project Veritas had reservations about publishing it.
Project Veritas, court testimony indicates, paid $40,000 for this alleged diary. As reported by The Associated Press in August 2022, the document had come into the possession of two people after one moved into an apartment previously occupied by Ashley Biden:
"Ashley Biden was moving out of a friend's Delray Beach home in spring 2020 when she stored the diary, tax records, a digital device with family photos, a cellphone and other items there, prosecutors said in a court filing."
' They said [Aimee] Harris then moved into the same room, found the items and got in touch with [Robert] Kurlander, who enthused in a text message that he would help her make a "ton of money" from selling it, adding an expletive before "ton."'
Harris and Kurlander pleaded guilty in August 2022 to conspiracy to transport stolen property across state lines in their sale of the document to Project Veritas.According to Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe in August 2022, his organization could not confirm the diary it received belonged to Ashley Biden.
In April 2024, the New York Times published a letter that Ashley Biden wrote to the Judge in Harris' case as part of her sentencing process in which Biden referenced the harm caused by the publication of photographs of her journal online, confirming that the words published online were hers while noting that they have been misinterpreted:
"After being the victim of a crime in my early twenties, I developed PTSD. The journal that was stolen was part of my efforts to heal. ... I am a private citizen, targeted only because my father happened to be running to be President. In other words, the extensive work I have done to move past my trauma was undone by Ms. Harris's actions.
Although this criminal act happened more than three years ago, because of the publicity it drew—exactly as Ms. Harris intended—I am constantly re-traumatized by it. I will forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be viewed online.
Repeatedly, I hear others grossly misinterpret my once-private writings and lob false accusations that defame my character and those of the people I love."
Again notice I give a link and you don't!
Those images I showed are REAL! Not stolen or non existing. Verify it yourself!
And you yourself are guilty of repeating Ashley Biden stuffering by posting that!
Technically you could be sued for posting that without context. See her statement in beige color.
Snopes wasn't sued because they gave her statement.
@Prison1203 no you missed the point of being cruel to others!
You have misrepresented the WHOLE TRUTH!
That's why you could be sued!
SW-User
And as DeWayfarer noted in his 2nd takedown of your “proof”, there is no proof that the contents printed to the president having done this to her in any way, shape, or form. James O’Keef, notorious Right Wing media gadfly, who never hesitates to do a takedown on any Democrat, wouldn’t publish it because he couldn’t verify that what he was given was factual. Let that sink in. A guy who makes his bread and butter by publishing [i]anything even slightly harmful,to Democrats wouldn’t , because he could not trust the validity of the source.
You can’t make this stuff up, which is why you had to.
