Who's the WORST Justice of the Three on the Far Right on SCOTUS?
Poll - Total Votes: 11
Samuel Alito
Neil Gorsuch
Clarence Thomas
You can only vote on one answer.
36-40, F
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@DeWayfarer
Gorsuch is not too "new."
fyi
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1323015/supreme-court-justices-ideological-scores-us/
Gorsuch is not too "new."
fyi
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1323015/supreme-court-justices-ideological-scores-us/
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@beckyromero I still say TOO NEW!
Insufficient data is still insufficient! You don't make that kind of judgement less than a decade.
BTW statistica just now invalidate any creditability with me.
They are charging for their statics now. That makes it biased!
If anyone charges, they have a motivation for profit. It's different when you put up advertising. That doesn't make it your profit.
I happen to know how little internet advertised actually brings in, as opposed to network media advertising.
Yet to charge on top of that screams biased! You must satisfy your customers biases, when you make it a business by charging.
If they charged more for the advertising, like with network media, that's different.
That's putting the burden on the advertisers, rather than on the customers. In this case those who pay for the product.
All this is excluding other profit gaining Internet methods, like what is used by Alphabet aka Google. That's even worse.
Yet even there it makes it easier by charging! You have the exact name and even location to track anyone. That is as well sellable, if not stealable.
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States since 2017
Insufficient data is still insufficient! You don't make that kind of judgement less than a decade.
BTW statistica just now invalidate any creditability with me.
They are charging for their statics now. That makes it biased!
If anyone charges, they have a motivation for profit. It's different when you put up advertising. That doesn't make it your profit.
I happen to know how little internet advertised actually brings in, as opposed to network media advertising.
Yet to charge on top of that screams biased! You must satisfy your customers biases, when you make it a business by charging.
If they charged more for the advertising, like with network media, that's different.
That's putting the burden on the advertisers, rather than on the customers. In this case those who pay for the product.
All this is excluding other profit gaining Internet methods, like what is used by Alphabet aka Google. That's even worse.
Yet even there it makes it easier by charging! You have the exact name and even location to track anyone. That is as well sellable, if not stealable.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@DeWayfarer
You or I are, of course, entitled to come up with our own scoring system.
But, regardless of what scoring system we design, I believe that SEVEN years of data and critical SCOTUS opinions for our country are MORE than sufficient to show what kind of justice that Gorsuch will continue to be.
He is NOT going to have some sort of epiphany and begin doing the greater good.
Rankings of where Gorsuch may fall between Roberts and those to the right of Roberts may change over time. Just as whether Alito or Thomas is the most "conservative" (or what I'd describe as "far right") in any given session.
Here's a list of opinions of SCOTUS going as far back as 2017 (and even earlier).
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/23
You or I are, of course, entitled to come up with our own scoring system.
But, regardless of what scoring system we design, I believe that SEVEN years of data and critical SCOTUS opinions for our country are MORE than sufficient to show what kind of justice that Gorsuch will continue to be.
He is NOT going to have some sort of epiphany and begin doing the greater good.
Rankings of where Gorsuch may fall between Roberts and those to the right of Roberts may change over time. Just as whether Alito or Thomas is the most "conservative" (or what I'd describe as "far right") in any given session.
Here's a list of opinions of SCOTUS going as far back as 2017 (and even earlier).
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/23