NYU Students planning a walkout following ANTI JEW PROTESTS.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/nyu-students-planning-walkout-following-violent-anti-israel-protests [c=BF0000] A group called the NYU Palestine Solidarity Coalition is calling on students at New York University to walk out of classes Tuesday following violent anti-Israel protests that unfolded there last night.
The group has posted on Instagram for students to walk out of class at 1 p.m. ET and head to Washington Square Park in Manhattan "to reflect, debrief [and] strategize."
Anti-Israel protests at New York University's campus turned violent Monday night when demonstrators hurled bottles at police officers who were sent to the scene to disperse a large unruly crowd, officials said.
NYPD sources confirmed to Fox News on Tuesday that 133 demonstrators were arrested by police using zip ties and flex cuffs to remove the protesters from campus. They were taken on a bus to police headquarters, where they were charged with trespassing, the sources added. [/c]
(For you idiots who STILL bring up Jan 6, where no one was hurt, THIS is your side of the aisle.)
Talking points for the educated posters here. (what few there are.)
1. These protestors are NAZIS. They are puppets of the raghead terrorists (Palestinians) who want Israel destroyed so they can have that land. PERIOD.
2. A lot of other kids who are not part of the NYU NAZI PALESTINIAN SOLIDARY COALITION might just be stupid and walk out of class.
3. Whether they graduate or not, (since they could flunk some courses), whether they are able to get a job or not, they WILL be on the hook to pay back those student loans. The professors got paid. The college got paid. And Nazi Democrat governments will merely direct tax dollars to pay back the lenders of those loans.
And you wonder why most people think blue states are the DUMBEST on the planet.
You might notice that NONE of this shit is taking place in the superior state of Florida. It might have something to do with our superior schools. It might be because our legislature and governor passed laws protecting the public from the animals who would block traffic or commit crimes all under the blanket of protest.
And you Nazis came totally unglued because of this.
@Richard65 @Richard65 If you look in the dictionary and find the word IGNORANCE, you would be able to find the definition. That doesn't automatically mean you are promoting IGNORANCE.
Let's just put my comments into context.
1. "The News Cycle is a commodity." Maybe you should look up the word "commodity." Basically, the news cycle is an item that is SOLD every day. Money is made from the news cycle. A LOT of money is made. It's called COMMERCIALS and ADVERTISMENTS. Every legitimate TV news show has commercials. For news companies to make money, they have to attract an audience and hold them. That is how they make money from charging what Rush Limbaugh once referred to as "confiscatory advertising rates."
2. I'm still trying to figure out how the news cycle being a bought and sold COMMODITY can somehow run opposite of the concept of "modern sensationalism journalism: if it bleeds, it leads." I see nothing hypocritical about revealing a fact.
Of course, there are left wing hack networks who try to sell fake news. (CNN, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, The View, etc.) They are about as journalistic as the National Enquirer, and not nearly as accurate. But they still have to be sold. On the televised versions of them, there ARE commercials. That's how they make money.
I haven't vilified anything here, (except goose stepping Nazis with shit for brains.) My statements are factual. And facts don't care about your feelings. And so far, you haven't even attempted to discuss the article itself.
@Reason10 Let me clarify your muddled excuse. On April 1st you vilified the media by explaining that it was sensationalism journalism. You then summed that approach up with the crass term, "If it bleeds, it leads." Even if you deny it, your statement must surely be a criticism of the media, and for you to claim otherwise is patently disingenuous. You're effectively saying the media trades on crude sensationalism, where it promotes violence for mere profit. If that's not a criticism, are you saying that's an acceptable approach by the media? You can't sit on the fence and pretend you're merely stating facts, because you made a subjective statement, which you either agree with or disagree with.
My point is that you trade in the self same sensationalism by constantly quoting the same media sources (Fox, etc) which promotes the exact style of "If it bleeds, it leads" journalism you highlighted. If you DON'T think it's an acceptable approach to covering the news, then why do you use such sensationalist sources to make your points?
