Protesters who impede traffic should be arrested, or ran over

There's a lot of sh*t in the US I hate too, but that doesn't give me the right to stand in front of your car with a gang of hoodlums. You are a hard working citizen who is trying to make the best out of life. You don't want someone holding up your time and your children's time for something you have no control over.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Reason10 · 61-69, M

Actually, the brilliant leadership in the state of Florida passed a bill that addressed this nonsense. And of course, there is a lawsuit against it.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/floridas-new-anti-riot-law-is-unconstitutional-lawsuit-claims

[c=BF0000]DeSantis signed the "anti-riot" bill into law this week. It increases penalties for crimes committed during riots and is aimed at "combating public disorder."
"If you look at the breadth of this particular piece of legislation, it is the strongest anti-rioting, pro-law enforcement piece of legislation in the country," DeSantis said. "There’s just nothing even close."

The law, which took effect immediately, grants civil legal immunity to people who drive through protesters blocking a road and allows authorities to hold arrested demonstrators from posting bail until after their first court date. The legislation increases the charge for battery on a police officer during a riot and adds language that could force local governments to justify a reduction in law enforcement budgets.

DESANTIS SIGNS FLORIDA'S 'ANTI-RIOT' BILL INTO LAW

The law allows people to sue local governments over personal or property damages if they were determined to have interfered with law enforcement response during civil unrest. It also increases penalties for protesters who block roadways or deface public monuments and creates a new crime, "mob intimidation."[/c]

Of course, racist hate groups like Burn Loot Murder (BLM) filed a lawsuit against this bill. I guess they want the freedom to be terrorists.

windinhishair · 61-69, M

@Reason10 You mean like the January 6 anti-American terrorists who attacked the Capitol and wrongly believe they are hostages?

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

windinhishair · 61-69, M

@Reason10 I see. And because they were ANTIFA, that's why Republicans refused to testify and did everything possible to protect the insurrectionists?

Thank goodness over 1,200 Trump Cultists who you believe were ANTIFA have already pleaded guilty and/or been sentenced for their crimes. And there are more to come.

Reason10 · 61-69, M

@windinhishair How about the several alleged visitors of the Capitol who were held WITHOUT BAIL OR DUE PROCESS.
The Nazi state is YOUR side of the aisle.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

windinhishair · 61-69, M

@Reason10 If alleged people were held without alleged due process, the allegations should be investigated. But that doesn’t change the facts about more than 1200 guilty Trump Cultists/Nazis. Nazis today support Trump because they recognize him as a kindred spirit.

LeopoldBloom · M

@Reason10 So Trump loves antifa?

If they're antifa, why are Trump and the other Republicans calling them "hostages" and promising to pardon them? Is Trump antifa?

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

windinhishair · 61-69, M

@Reason10 Over 1200 have been tried, convicted and sentenced or pleaded guilty and were sentenced. All of them are avowed Trump Cultists, unless you have evidence that they were ANTIFA. And if the latter is true, why has Trump promised to pardon them all? Is Trump ANTIFA?