This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
You might be pissed if a left wing judge made a judgement against you
@Patriot96 The judge admits that when he was in college he went to "huge, sometimes boisterous, Vietnam War protests." Old-time Nixon hater, probably.
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@Patriot96 nonsense
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@JimboSaturn Hey, the facts are the facts. Probably a left-wing hippie when he was a kid.
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays did anyone really think trump could get a fair trial in ny. The verdict was in before the trial began
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@Patriot96 Yes everyone did. Dont you find it strange that he is always the victim every single time? How naieve can you be exactly? What a cultist. Awww poor baby Trump is such a littlle victim waaa!
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays So ? I agree Res ipsa loquitor , the facts speak for themselves that is was he lost. The facts proved he is a fraud and liar and cheat. Don't give me he didn't get a fair trial bullshit. He says that everytime like a whiney school child "not fair!" . Fuck that rich spoilled priveledge brat
@JimboSaturn The thing speaks for itself. Res is thing.
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
the facts speak for themselves. So do you have anything more concrete ? Lame as usual.
@JimboSaturn It's thing not facts.
Lingua tua vitiosa est, domine!!
Lingua tua vitiosa est, domine!!
[image/video - please log in to see this content]
JimboSaturn · 56-60, M
Ok I concede that latin was wrong but do you have anything about this post to argue? I guess you have to grasp on something . Also this tort is used as I described in court @FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays
@JimboSaturn
Nothing to disagree with. These facts were proved in court. Trump would not have gotten a fairer trial with jurors. In fact, arguably, he did pretty well with this judge. The judge let him carry on his business enterprise. Also, he got a comprehensive written decision, which he wouldn't have gotten with a jury. With a jury he'd just get a verdict.
I'm just yanking your chain. I'm bored. Friday night and I have nothing to do. Have a good weekend!
The facts proved he is a fraud and liar and cheat.
Nothing to disagree with. These facts were proved in court. Trump would not have gotten a fairer trial with jurors. In fact, arguably, he did pretty well with this judge. The judge let him carry on his business enterprise. Also, he got a comprehensive written decision, which he wouldn't have gotten with a jury. With a jury he'd just get a verdict.
I'm just yanking your chain. I'm bored. Friday night and I have nothing to do. Have a good weekend!
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@Patriot96
You might be pissed if a left wing judge made a judgement against you
Don't do the crime if you can't pay the price.
MethDozer · M
@Patriot96 Absolutely he had a fair trial
. He's been fucking people over in NY for decades and getting away with it. His history of fraud is nothing new or anything people haven't been asking for him to be held accountable for for decades here. He's been getting away with it since the 80's.
. He's been fucking people over in NY for decades and getting away with it. His history of fraud is nothing new or anything people haven't been asking for him to be held accountable for for decades here. He's been getting away with it since the 80's.