Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Trump Throws NATO Under The Putin Bus

Trump says he'd 'encourage' Russia to attack NATO allies who don't pay their bills
FEBRUARY 11, 20242:12 AM ET
By
The Associated Press

NEW YORK — Republican front-runner Donald Trump said Saturday that, as president, he warned NATO allies that he "would encourage" Russia "to do whatever the hell they want" to countries that are "delinquent" as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.

Speaking at a rally in Conway, South Carolina, Trump recounted a story he has told before about an unidentified NATO member who confronted him over his threat not to defend members who fail to meet the trans-Atlantic alliance's defense spending targets.

But this time, Trump went further, saying had told the member that he would, in fact, "encourage" Russia to do as it wishes in that case.

'You didn't pay? You're delinquent?'" Trump recounted saying. "'No I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You gotta pay. You gotta pay your bills.'"

NATO allies agreed in 2014, after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula, to halt the spending cuts they had made after the Cold War and move toward spending 2% of their GDPs on defense by 2024.

White House spokesperson Andrew Bates responded, saying that: "Encouraging invasions of our closest allies by murderous regimes is appalling and unhinged – and it endangers American national security, global stability, and our economy at home."

Trump's comments come as Ukraine remains mired in its efforts to stave off Russia's 2022 invasion and as Republicans in Congress have become increasingly skeptical of providing additional aid money to the country as it struggles with stalled counteroffensives and weapons shortfalls.

They also come as Trump and his team are increasingly confident he will lock up the nomination in the coming weeks following commanding victories in the first votes of the 2024 Republican nominating calendar.

During his 2016 campaign, Trump alarmed Western allies by warning that the United States, under his leadership, might abandon its NATO treaty commitments and only come to the defense of countries that meet the alliance's guidelines by committing 2 percent of their gross domestic products to military spending.

Trump, as president, eventually endorsed NATO's Article 5 mutual defense clause, which states that an armed attack against one or more of its members shall be considered an attack against all members. But he often depicted NATO allies as leeches on the U.S. military and openly questioned the value of the military alliance that has defined American foreign policy for decades.

As of 2022, NATO reported that seven of what are now 31 NATO member countries were meeting that obligation — up from three in 2014. Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine has spurred additional military spending by some NATO members.

Trump has often tried to take credit for that increase, and bragged again Saturday that, as a results of his threats, "hundreds of billions of dollars came into NATO"— even though countries do not pay NATO directly.

Note: Article above edited...you can easily read the entire piece at the AP, Guardian, NPR, and many other sources.

Never forget: Trump stood before us and the world in Helsinki, and sided with war criminal Putin, over our allies and intel agencies. He touted Putin as a genius for invading Ukraine.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
specman · 51-55, M
I don’t agree with Trump and his opinion on NATO . I do believe that all the countries should put the 2% into their defense budget. I think NATO is a good thing.
22Michelle · 61-69, T
@specman If there is no realistic defence role for some countries, other than defending their verv small borders 2% is a waste of resources. Far better thaf NATO looks at how effective each member's military forces are.
specman · 51-55, M
@22Michelle so you’re saying they don’t have to pay 2% if they’re a small country?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@specman None of the NATO members have to pay 2% of anything. The organisation has shared funding from a common fund. Those funds are allocated and distributed in a reasoned and adult manner that takes into account individual circumstances.

trump made it sound like nATO is a golf club with annual green fees. Of course, that childish and simplistic charactisation reflects trump's abysmal lack of comprehension of what happens in the world of grown-ups. It also plays well with those of his supporters who operate at the same level of abject ignorance
22Michelle · 61-69, T
@specman No, what I'm say8ng is that 2% can be a rather arbitary figure. It should be seen as a guide, but the real issue is how effective would that country's military be in a conflict. Spending 2% on crap just gets you a bunch of crap, and invites corruption.
Strictgram · 70-79, C
@newjaninev2 The US has carried Europe for 80 years. Trump is smart to tell them the free ride is over.
JSul3 · 70-79
@Strictgram So you think the US Military Industrial Complex is suddenly going close every base, and bring all of the troops around the globe, home?

Lol. No wonder Trump loves the poorly educated.

Here is one for you:

Invocation of Article 5
The 9/11 terrorist attacks
The United States was the object of brutal terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001. The Alliance's 1999 Strategic Concept had already identified terrorism as one of the risks affecting NATO’s security. The Alliance’s response to 9/11, however, saw NATO engage actively in the fight against terrorism, launch its first operations outside the Euro-Atlantic area and begin a far-reaching transformation of its capabilities. Moreover, it led NATO to invoke Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty for the very first time in its history.

An act of solidarity
On the evening of 12 September 2001, less than 24 hours after the attacks, the Allies invoked the principle of Article 5. Then NATO Secretary General Lord Robertson subsequently informed the Secretary-General of the United Nations of the Alliance's decision.

The North Atlantic Council – NATO’s principal political decision-making body – agreed that if it determined that the attack was directed from abroad against the United States, it would be regarded as an action covered by Article 5. On 2 October, once the Council had been briefed on the results of investigations into the 9/11 attacks, it determined that they were regarded as an action covered by Article 5.

By invoking Article 5, NATO members showed their solidarity toward the United States and condemned, in the strongest possible way, the terrorist attacks against the United States.
Strictgram · 70-79, C
@JSul3 It's very simple. Europe must pay their military fair share. US has been carrying them for 80 years and the gravy train is over.
JSul3 · 70-79
@Strictgram LOL! So when is the US closing bases and bringing troops home?
Strictgram · 70-79, C
@JSul3 NATO will pay up and US forces will stay in place.
JSul3 · 70-79
@Strictgram Nations have increased their defense spending.
Strictgram · 70-79, C
@JSul3 Fine, so what is your point?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SevIsPamprinYouAlways · 56-60, F
@Strictgram

Spoken like the Reich-Wing , America-hating, MAGA-Mind that you are.

Oh, by the way, your new hat came in. Put it on. It fits you perfectly.

Strictgram · 70-79, C
@SevIsPamprinYouAlways Lying marxist rat.
SevIsPamprinYouAlways · 56-60, F
@Strictgram Nope. You’re both the liar, and the Russia-lover. You and your Reich-Wing ilk even had t-shirts to proclaim your true allegiance:


ETA: In addition to your hatred of the rule of law:

This comment is hidden. Show Comment