Creative
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

My Response to ididntknow Wanting to Travel Back in Time to 1941 Because He Doesn't Want the Current President of the United States to Be Born.

I can think of a much better reason to time-travel back to 1941.

[media=https://youtu.be/MtvZK6X0zro]





He's a Neo-Nazi, so I'm sure if he could travel to that date, it would be to help the Nazis win the war.
@beckyromero He actually blocked me because I was pointing out that his "Cultural Marxism" conspiracy theory comes from the Nazis.
Funny how he doesn't want people talking about that...
@BohemianBoo He blocked me too; I no longer remember why.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@BohemianBoo @ElwoodBlues I was also blocked, for providing facts that he didn't like. Good riddance.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
I sometimes wonder if going back in take would ever change anything.

The future from there could mean your own existence would never happen. A paradox.

Mine own existence could have easily not have happened going back to 1941. Both my parents were greatly affected by WWII. Like their own lives or deaths. A misplaced breathe could have been all the difference for either one or both. And who knows what else would have happened because of the loss of their own lives? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Four of my siblings were born around that time. Two actual did pass away. 1941, 1943, 1944, 1945. One might have survived being born in 1936.
@beckyromero Time travel of a sort also features in "The Peripheral," a series on amazon prime based on a William Gibson novel. It's really some of the smartest science fiction around these days; unfortunately the actor's strike seems to have killed season 2 and beyond.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@beckyromero either one you would have the problem of matter recreation.

No two pieces of matter can be the same. They would destroy each other. Now I might not exist in that time frame, yet the matter that I am made of most definitely does exist then.

Other physics laws apply. Like matter popping in and out of the universe. Causing more matter to exist in one time frame than the other.

How can there be more matter in the past than in the future? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Matter does not cease to exist. Even in a singularity it only becomes denser.

To my knowledge none of that has been explained. It would throw off all kinds of physics laws.

Imagine a universe where a singularity popped in from the future. Instantly collapsing the universe as it was formed at the time of the big bang.

No universe!

Or better a whole universe popping in from the future to a past universe.

Now it's been claimed that that something from the past can go to the future. There's actually a mathematical theory on that.

Yet even that has problems with instant matter recreation.

Dimensional shifts? Same problem. How can even the air exist in the same place at the same time as your own body? 🤷🏻‍♂️

A complete vacuum does not exist within this universe. There's always photons of light within the universe.

A votex of some type? Then you have a exchange of matter. What was in the past is in the future and what is in the future is now in the past.

Now you have the problem of past matter in the future and future matter in the past.

Think what that would do to carbon dating? The half life of the carbon would be older from the future in the past. And younger from the past to the future.

You would have to change ALL the physics laws we know of to even allow for time travel.

Even gravitational laws, since there would be more or less mass one way or the other.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@ElwoodBlues

Haven't been watching much TV of late. And I hate it when good series get cancelled without a resolution - or do horrible endings like Game of Thrones did. Makes me really think of investing my time into a new series when they do stuff like that.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment