Colorado now wants Trump on its ballot

Some uneducated moron asked me for proof. Colorado actually wants LEGALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMP on its ballot even though its Supreme Court violated the Constitution by kicking him off.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/colorado-include-trump-2024-primary-ballot-state-gop-appeals-supreme-court

Colorado to include Trump on 2024 primary ballot as state GOP appeals to Supreme Court

The Colorado secretary of state will include former President Donald Trump on the 2024 Colorado primary ballot after Republicans filed an appeal to the Supreme Court.

On Wednesday, the Colorado GOP filed an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court after the state Supreme Court's decision to remove Trump from the primary ballot.

Following the appeal, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold announced that she will include Trump on the primary ballot on the Jan. 5 certification deadline, unless the U.S. Supreme Court affirms the lower court's ruling or declines to take up the case.

Now, to bring the uneducated folk here up to speed, the Colorado Supreme Court has violated the Constitution by taking Trump off. They claim it was based on his leading an insurrection. Thing is, he was IMPEACHED for precisely that crime and was found NOT GUILTY by the Senate. So there was NO insurrection to charge him with.

(There was no insurrection, anyway. Liberals are pretty STUPID when they call that romp on Capitol Hill an insurrection.)

So the United STates Supreme Court (which, thanks to Trump nominees has a pretty good track record on reading the Constitution) will easily reverse the Colorado NAZI decision.

He is going to run and he is going to win, even with voter fraud. Most of the country wants him to be president. Most of the country wants UNELECTED JOE GONE.

Those are the facts and they don't care about your feelings.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

BohemianBabe · M

This is probably fake news, since the source is Fox. And either way, Trump shouldn't be allowed to run again, since he's against democracy.

Reason10 · 70-79, M

@BohemianBabe
You're such a whiny child when you lose an argument.
Fox is the number one rated news source in the world, probably because it gives equal time to left and right. You don't like it because it isn't THE VIEW or CNN or any other NAZI rags.
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO IS AGAINST DEMOCRACY, by wanting Trump taken off the ballot. You are against the American people reelecting him in a landslide.

BohemianBabe · M

@Reason10 What argument did I lose?

Fox is the number one news source because they're funded by billionaires. Popular doesn't mean accurate. Besides, now that their private texts were leaked in those lawsuits, we know that they're purposely lying.

Yes, I think in order for a democracy to function, only people who believe in democracy should be allowed to participate. When Trump was president, he tried to end our democracy. Therefore, he shouldn't be allowed to hold public office again.
You're against democracy because you support someone who, not only tried to end our democracy, but also admits he wants to be a dictator.

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@BohemianBabe i think this is false flag troll intended to make MAGA folks look dumb. Maga folks are dumb, but not to this extreme

Reason10 · 70-79, M

@BohemianBabe

Fox is the number one news source because they're funded by billionaires. Popular doesn't mean accurate. Besides, now that their private texts were leaked in those lawsuits, we know that they're purposely lying.

Prove that or admit you're lying.
Fox viewers make up most of America. And the CNNs and THE VIEW rags are all the liars.

BohemianBabe · M

@trollslayer I don't know, a lot of them actually have said Fox is accurate because it's the top rated "news" channel. And if all they watch is Fox, then they don't know about the leaked texts.

ElwoodBlues · M

@Reason10 Seems you might have a reading comprehension problem. Here's one of your red paragraphs:

Following the appeal, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold announced that she will include Trump on the primary ballot on the Jan. 5 certification deadline, unless the U.S. Supreme Court affirms the lower court's ruling or declines to take up the case.

You recognize that 'unless' clause, don't you? See how it modifies the meaning of the first part of here statement?

... she will include Trump ... unless the U.S. Supreme Court affirms the lower court's ruling or declines to take up the case (the lower court ruled to allow Trump; Colorado's Supremes said nope).

Reversing the negatives, It's equivalent to saying Griswold won't include Trump unless SCOTUS reverses the Colorado ruling.

Yeah, Fox put in that complex phrasing to make you feel good, but it still doesn't mean what you wish it would mean.

Reason10 · 70-79, M

@BohemianBabe So far, YOUR GOOSE STEPPING NAZI BLUE STATES are the ones removing LEGALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMP from the ballots, so don't EVEN talk about being pro-Democracy. Your side of the aisle wipes its ass on the Constitution.

ElwoodBlues · M

@Reason10 14th Amendment section 3, it's the LAW, dude!!

Remember the Emoluments Clause? Trump and your side of the aisle sure wiped their asses on THAT part of the Constitution!!

Ever heard of Stare Decisis? your side of the aisle sure wiped their asses on THAT longstanding SCOTUS principle!!

BohemianBabe · M

@Reason10 Like I said, if someone is anti-democracy, then they shouldn't be allowed to participate in democracy. We should ban the Republican Party, much like Germany banned the Nazi Party.

Reason10 · 70-79, M

@ElwoodBlues No insurrection was committed, YOU MORON.

To the posters who wonder about the Emoluments Clause (which is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT in this instance)
Also known as the Title of Nobility Clause, Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution prohibits any person holding a government office from accepting any present, emolument, office, or title from any "King, Prince, or foreign State," without congressional consent.

Right now, Unelected Joe is guilty of violating that when the government of China paid him those millions.

https://nypost.com/2022/01/27/chinese-elite-have-paid-some-31m-to-hunter-and-the-bidens/

Stare Decisis has to do with judicial findings based on precedent. I know you didn't know what that means, but threw it out there just to feel important. It's irrelevant to the Trump story because he is not a federal judge and has not been asked to rule on anything

Just shut up. You're wrong. You know it and we know it.

Reason10 · 70-79, M

@BohemianBabe The Republicans aren't the ones trying to interfere with the election by trying to pull LEGALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMPS' name from state ballots. THAT'S NAZI AND THAT'S YOUR SIDE OF THE AISLE, Sgt. Schultz.

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@Reason10 maybe cut your sodium in half.

ElwoodBlues · M

@Reason10 Some of trump's buddies, the Proud Boys, were sentenced for seditious conspiracy; a half step away from insurrection. And the investigation is still gathering steam, YOU MORON.

The text of the 14th A Sec 3 reads "... shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same," in other words, "rebellion" is a sufficient reason for barring Trump, YOU MORON.

You don't seem to understand how the Emoluments Clause applied to Trump's Washington DC hotel. Foreign governments (e.g., Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Turkey, China & Malaysia) spent hundreds of thousands of dollars there while lobbying Trump, knowing that money would flow to Trump's pockets, YOU MORON.

Stare Decisis refers to your side of the aisle helping to throw out the "settled law" of Roe v Wade, YOU MORON.

Your NY Post link doesn't show a PENNY flowing to President Joe Biden. As for Hunter, he's not a scammer, he''s a "smart businessman," or at least that's what you would say if his name were Trump, LOL!!!

Just shut up. You're wrong. You know it and we know it.