Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

"Cultural Marxism"

The Right uses “Marxism” to describe everything from LGBTQ rights to corporate diversity measures. It’s a deeply confused definition. But it’s not wrong about one thing: Marxists do indeed want to dismantle all forms of oppression.

The American right’s long tradition of red-baiting has always involved branding any kind of efforts at progressive social change, from the mild liberal variety to the genuinely radical, as socialist or communist. One of the most conspiratorial forms of this idea — with roots in the Nazis’ antisemitic theory of “Judeo-Bolshevism” — goes under the name “cultural Marxism.” That’s the theory that Jewish leftists fleeing Nazi Germany, including Frankfurt School theorists, plotted to subtly indoctrinate Americans in Marxist ideology, which they intentionally and surreptitiously rebranded in less-scary “cultural” forms like feminism and black liberation.

In other words, radical Jewish immigrant professors are behind all the movements for greater civil rights and social equality, which are actually a secret vehicle for the imposition of Soviet-style communism in the United States. There’s no evidence to back up this conspiracy theory, but that hasn’t interfered with its staying power. The cultural Marxist is just too attractive to the Right, tying together many of its favorite bogeymen into a neat story. The theory might not possess the mythology of the QAnon universe, but its utility for right-wing ideologues has kept it in play for the better part of a century.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User Best Comment
What all the right-wingers complaining about "wokeism" won't admit is that they ultimately don't just have a problem with modern performative identity politics, they fundamentally take issue with civil rights on a basic level. They are the people who would've opposed civil rights legislation 60 years ago. The intent is the same: preserve the power structures that ensure that certain people are always at the top and other people know their place. Anyone trying to upset that particular definition of order is by default a chaotic, disruptive agent of Marxism/communism/Judaism, etc. The "cabal" explanation absolves them of having to consider that these impulses might come from the people. They always claim to speak for "the people", the "moral majority". They think the majority of people want total abortion bans, book bans, and trans youth treated like shit. Put this stuff to vote and you get a very different result, even in some conservative areas (see the recent vote on an abortion ban in Kansas). [i]Actually[/i] being "populist" would be a problem. But that's not what it's ever been about.
SW-User
@SW-User you put the stuff to the vote, you will indeed see what the people truly want, and it [i]terrifies [/i]the right wingers.

No wonder they are trying to gerrymander and rig every possible election it can get their hands on.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@SW-User Best Comment for the fellow Marxists?

Why am I not surprised?
Gloomy · F
@SumKindaMunster What he wrote is spot on and by any chance are you one of those nice people buying into "Cultural Marxism"?
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Gloomy I made a separate comment for you on the subject.
SW-User
@Gloomy are you talking to me?
Gloomy · F
@SW-User No to SumKindaMunster but you guys might have blocked each other
SW-User
@Gloomy yes we have. He doesn’t subscribe to well argued viewpoints that differ from his own, and whatever you do, do NOT ask him to back up his opinions with sources. He is right, and you are not. End of story.
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
@SW-User If [i] the people [/i] really wanted what terrifies the right gerrymandering wouldn't work. Real life politics is more complicated and there are plenty of people willing to vote against their own interests so long as even greater damage will be done to those they have been taught to hate.
SW-User
@ninalanyon A cynical commentator once said "politics is all about making the people you don't like suffer".
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
@SW-User That's a shame. Especially as politics is the means by which our lives are improved; when it works.

Cynicism is destructive of trust and hinders progress.
chrisCA · M
@SW-User Most people don't even know the definition of "being woke", or it's origin. To them, it is the latest boogeyman to be feared.
wonkywinky · 51-55, M
@SW-User Most decent normal people still the majority thankfully definitely do not like all the sudden rush towards the acceptance of sexual deviancy as normal.Thank God.
Gloomy · F
@wonkywinky You make a lot of subjective value judgments especially when calling something "sexual deviancy"
Do you argue under a christian moral framework and how do you know a majority agrees with you? Do you have statistics?
SW-User
@wonkywinky Yeah, well, most of it is a long time coming and far from “sudden”. I fully support the normalization of homosexuality and trans identity. Trans identity will take longer to accept, but homosexuality is treated mostly as a non-issue where I live. So I dare say it’s been successful.