Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Taliban, US government...Sharia, Christian...

So hard to tell the difference, don't you think?

Why just this last week (thank you, anythingoes), vastly male ,vastly Republican lawmakers in Missouri thought they'd redefine what they think women should look like in public and adopted a law to enforce it. No more bare arms. Oh, don't worry, men, apparently you're all good to go.

[quote]...The House's existing dress code defined proper attire for women as "dresses or skirts or slacks worn with a blazer or sweater and appropriate dress shoes or boots," according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. It also had rules about men's clothing, though no one sought to update them this week.

Republican state Rep. Ann Kelley proposed an amendment that would require women to wear jackets — defined as both blazers and knit blazers — because "it is essential to always maintain a formal and professional atmosphere."

Several House Democrats were quick to push back, deriding the proposal as sexist, impractical and even hypocritical. "Yep, the caucus that lost their minds over the suggestion that they should wear masks during a pandemic to respect the safety of others is now spending its time focusing on the fine details of what women have to wear (specifically how to cover their arms) to show respect here," tweeted Democratic Rep. Peter Merideth.

[i]https://www.npr.org/2023/01/13/1149057491/missouri-house-dress-code-women-cardigan[/i][/quote]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
scrood · 31-35
Okay, you can't have it both ways, either you support arbitrary laws such as face bras, or you nullify laws you don't like because you're a a neoConfederate radical feminist, or you put up with the HORROR of dressing decently in a public house by wearing a frigging JACKET.

I do not believe women should be wearing men's clothing, cross-dressing in men's pants and jackets. Meanwhile men have military style suits covering all body except face, where's the feminists whining about that?

If you knew about Christianity it is that it is very sinful to seduce others? Women dress worse than harlots and whores nowadays and they will NEVER go back to modesty and public decency. It is hypersexual, offensive, and disgusting.

Further the religious BIGOTRY here is amusing, Christianity has NO LAWS on women's dress but the tradition of the chapel veil ONLY IN CHAPEL. It is just expected women can moderate themselves and dress decently in public. Because the Jewish man must cover his head in worship of prayer, but the Christian man must not, in imitation of Christ, the most famous Jew, it is shameful for the man to cover his head in the church. Meanwhile the religion of peace routinely executes women and men for violations of dress and enforces military style discipline on its worship five times a day, a sign of submission and dhimitude rather than true worship, adherence to earthly affaris rather than to salvation of souls. Mohammad hid his women in cloaks and veils because they were getting MURDERED by his rivals in their seraglios, not because of religious piety.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@scrood Um, it’s one state policy, not the thread that unravels history.