Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Most ironic political demand of the year . . .

Most ironic political demand of the year . . .

It's time to retire! Democrats are shouting this at supreme court justices Elena Kagan (age 62), and Sonia Sotomayor (68).

No $hit. 100% true. Democrats really, really, are begging for these retirements, according to pieces in “Vox” and elsewhere. For those insulated from a diversity of political views, Vox is “progressive/left of center”, and in addition to its website promotes ifs views through YouTube, Netflix, podcasts, Twitter, etc.

So where's the irony? That an 80-year-old president with either senile dementia or sleeping sickness should remain in office, and appoint successors to SCOTUS justices decades younger than himself?

Or that Vox and similar sites are too effing stupid to be believed?

I'm going with “stupid”

By all accounts justices Kagan (the supreme court's first openly “enthusiastic female softball player”) and Sottomayor (“smarter than a typical wise Latino grandmother”) are more alert, harder working, and better able to speak without cue cards and easter bunny escorts than the president.

And if they decline in vigor – which probably won't be soon – hopefully they will do the right thing, and resign.

Does anyone believe Biden – given the chance – would discover and appoint replacement justices of higher caliber?

I don't regularly follow who votes how on the supreme court. So I can't cite a list of the decisions by left – or right leaning – justices that I disagree with. But I'm sure that if Kagan and Sottomayor were communists or Taleban apologists, someone would have told us.

All this conniving (getting rid of Kagan and Sottomayor) is of course predicated on worry that not only will Biden lose the white house to some republican in 2024, but congress might flip again too.

Hey, Vox unpopuli – the answer to that problem is straightforward. Run a democrat presidential candidate capable of actually governing and explaining his or her decisions.

Unless you don't have any . . . ?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Replacing those two with younger liberals will have no effect on the conservative majority, and more significantly, doesn’t address the court’s real shortcomings. I would support jurisdiction stripping and the creation of a separate court to handle appellate cases (which the Constitution allows), but there’s no chance of Congress passing anything that bold.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@LeopoldBloom replacing kagan and sottomayor now is a hedge against Biden (or Kamala Harris) losing the 2024 election, and republican nominating their replacements.
@SusanInFlorida I understand that. However, that won't address the systemic issues with the Supreme Court. If you're interested in what those are, I recommend The Case Against the Supreme Court by Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of Berkeley Law. He doesn't bring up my preferred solution, but he makes a strong case for how, with a handful of exceptions, the court has failed in its intended purpose. Replacing Sotomayor and Kagan isn't even a temporary fix.

If Thomas and Alito (the two oldest justices) are replaced in the next two years, we're back to a liberal majority, but that won't address the systemic problems either.