Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Most ironic political demand of the year . . .

Most ironic political demand of the year . . .

It's time to retire! Democrats are shouting this at supreme court justices Elena Kagan (age 62), and Sonia Sotomayor (68).

No $hit. 100% true. Democrats really, really, are begging for these retirements, according to pieces in “Vox” and elsewhere. For those insulated from a diversity of political views, Vox is “progressive/left of center”, and in addition to its website promotes ifs views through YouTube, Netflix, podcasts, Twitter, etc.

So where's the irony? That an 80-year-old president with either senile dementia or sleeping sickness should remain in office, and appoint successors to SCOTUS justices decades younger than himself?

Or that Vox and similar sites are too effing stupid to be believed?

I'm going with “stupid”

By all accounts justices Kagan (the supreme court's first openly “enthusiastic female softball player”) and Sottomayor (“smarter than a typical wise Latino grandmother”) are more alert, harder working, and better able to speak without cue cards and easter bunny escorts than the president.

And if they decline in vigor – which probably won't be soon – hopefully they will do the right thing, and resign.

Does anyone believe Biden – given the chance – would discover and appoint replacement justices of higher caliber?

I don't regularly follow who votes how on the supreme court. So I can't cite a list of the decisions by left – or right leaning – justices that I disagree with. But I'm sure that if Kagan and Sottomayor were communists or Taleban apologists, someone would have told us.

All this conniving (getting rid of Kagan and Sottomayor) is of course predicated on worry that not only will Biden lose the white house to some republican in 2024, but congress might flip again too.

Hey, Vox unpopuli – the answer to that problem is straightforward. Run a democrat presidential candidate capable of actually governing and explaining his or her decisions.

Unless you don't have any . . . ?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
Nothing that you have said is wrong.. However, it does ignore one vital fact. The US system of government is so multi level and diverse that no one has any real prospect of governing effectively. Even if the President, the senate and the Congress get all their ducks lined up, each state is an effective kingdom of its own chosing and will refuse, delay or subvert any decision at the federal level. Now personally I dont think thats a good thing. Because right or wrong, it does create the paralysis we see in America today..😷
@whowasthatmaskedman Taking this OP off to federalism seems like a real stretch.

Must be a slow day.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@MistyCee In just a "big picture" kind of person.. Of course right and wrong exist. But as long as the best outcome for the greatest number is achieved I will trade Democracy for the Divine Right of Kings. And right now, Democracy "Aint goin' $h*t" for the average American..😷