Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Vectors for misinformation, UNITE!

I don't even know what the hell Karine Jean-Pierre and that Stanford professor are talking about, but it sounds like so much fun, count me in!


I'm a Twitter vector and I'm proud. I'm part of an original crowd! And if you look around these days, there seems to be a Twitter vector craze!

I'm a vector, he's a vector, she's a vector, we're a vector, wouldn't you like to be a vector too? 😊
Be a vector, be a Twitter vector!

[media=https://youtu.be/jvCTaccEkMI]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Northwest · M
@LamontCranston
She explained in a reply to another commenter the QandA which led to her post.

You must be time-vector challenged. That event happened AFTER I posted my comment, or was posted to someone who blocks me.

It actually done not matter what "vector" literally means.

But that't the entire focus of the poster's attempt at sarcasm.

The dumb (or ingenuous) question led to Molly's clever riff on Orwellian concerns.

It also looks like you did not notice that whatever that was, is NOT part of the OP's post.

Or are you completely in support of bring Nina Jankowitz back?

And, of course you insist on introducing a strawman.
@Northwest Look, NW, I've never liked you but I did not mean to be disputional in this thread. What an argumenttive ninny you are.
Northwest · M
@LamontCranston
Look, NW, I've never liked you but I did not mean to be disputional in this thread.

And yet, this is what you did.

What an argumenttive ninny you are.

Says the guy who's arguing that my response to the OP should have taken into account the OPs comment, posted AFTER I commented.

🤣😂
@Northwest Yeah, yeah, yeah. You continue to be an argumentative ninny.
Northwest · M
@LamontCranston
Yeah, yeah, yeah. You continue to be an argumentative ninny.

Says the guy who continues to argue. I keep thinking that at some point, a light bulb is going to go off and you will realize that it takes two, but that's hope against hope. Or, in your case as well, going for the ad hominem, instead of the topic of discussion.
@Northwest Why don't you just admit that your original comment was just an ostentations show of pedantry. Then I'll say, it is probably excusable because you've had to suffer throught the (slight) misuse of the word enough.
Won't that sooth your spirits?
Northwest · M
@LamontCranston
Why don't you just admit that your original comment was just an ostentations show of pedantry. Then I'll say, it is probably excusable because you've had to suffer throught the (slight) misuse of the word enough.
Won't that sooth your spirits?

I think you need a brain transplant, so you could process the following:

1. Insisting that a comment, take into consideration an argument that has yet to be made, is idiotic.

2. That to insist on #1, is the very essence of pedantry.

3. That accusing someone of being an argumentative ninny, when you brazenly engage in such behavior, is a deflection.

But, hey, as long as you're not an argumentative ninny. 🤣😂
@Northwest I am not and you ARE. You can't change that, ninny. It is your essence. Just look over your train of posts and comments: argumentative ninniness.If anyone deserves to be the object of ad hominems, it IS Northwest. {smile]
Northwest · M
@LamontCranston
I am not and you ARE. You can't change that, ninny. It is your essence. Just look over your train of posts and comments: argumentative ninniness.If anyone deserves to be the object of ad hominems, it IS Northwest. {smile]

And here you are, trying to prove you're not an argumentative ninny. Way to go champ. 🤣😂
@Northwest You don't need to quote me. But I do urently suggest that you repeat what I said while looking in a mirror. It might lead to reform.
And you are THE Champ, for whatever it is worth.
Northwest · M
@LamontCranston
You don't need to quote me. But I do urently suggest that you repeat what I said while looking in a mirror. It might lead to reform.
And you are THE Champ, for whatever it is worth.

And yet, again, you're trying to prove I'm the argumentative ninny. But as long as you're not.
@Northwest I'm not. And i regret that you don't consider sriously my avuncular advice. But one thing I am: and that is-as a man-about-town- I have plenty of leisure and can keep up these "exchanges" as long as you like, A.N.
Northwest · M
@LamontCranston
I'm not.

Let me educate about basic arithmetic. You contributed more comments than I did. If you think this amounts to argumentative ninny, then you should learn how to do the math.

And i regret that you don't consider sriously my avuncular advice.

Do the math grandpa. At this stage, I would consider a head examination if I were you.
@Northwest Ah, now that is a bit nasty. You must be getting sensitive. Perhaps psychotic? Thinking of violence? I am not your grandpa, thanks be to God. Your comments, while slightly fewer, were more inane
Northwest · M
@LamontCranston

I am not your grandpa, thanks be to God.

Let's recap. You said:

i regret that you don't consider sriously my avuncular advice

I'm being respectful of the elderly, that you proclaim yourself to be. Or did you already forgot you said that?

Ah, now that is a bit nasty. You must be getting sensitive.

Simply responding to you, but I guess you forgot about your own comments?

Perhaps psychotic? Thinking of violence?

Strawman and strawman,

Your comments, while slightly fewer, were more inane

Using terms like inane, and avuncular not only date, but shows how confused you are about who's doling out the ad hominem. But it's not like you can do arithmetic.

One more time, your comments to me, are more than my comments to you. What does that make you?
@NorthwestThat last message makes You even more inane, argumentative ninny. Your ondurate inability to take helpful advice is pitiful.
Gee, good choices of words date one---you must be one of the very hippest of ignoramuses.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment