Politics & News

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Evidence Shows David DePape Could Never Fit Through the Hole in Broken Window in the Rear of Pelosi Home #Pelosigate

New evidence shows that there is no way that David DePape could have broken into the Pelosi house through the door in the back.

David DePape was identified by the police at the Pelosi home on early Friday morning at around 2:30 am. The police claim that he broke into the house.

The Gateway Pundit reported yesterday on the impossibility of someone breaking into the Pelosi house and going unnoticed.

They were able to confirm that there are CCTV cameras all over the Pelosi house. The US Speaker of the House would of course have a well-protected home. There also is a security detail at the Pelosi house reportedly around the clock.

There is no way that someone could break into the back door and then enter the house and go unnoticed but this is what the San Francisco Police want us to believe happened.

The police state that Paul Pelosi called the police and the police did not respond to an alarm at the house but rather to a call from Paul Pelosi.

We are supposed to believe that DePape made it into the Pelosi house unimpeded and no one noticed the broken door and that Paul Pelosi found him, stepped into a bathroom to call the police, and then came back and fought with DePape over a hammer and the alarms never went off and the security detail on duty ignored the forced entry into the house through the back door.

Today we have more information on this story. We have determined that the hole in the glass in the door is much too small for David DePape to fit through. The broken glass on the back steps as noted on Saturday is outside the house which indicates the window was broken from the inside of the house.

Did Pelosi or DePape use the hammer to break the wind from the inside?

More Information–

From the photos the opened doors in the crime scene are on the left. The broken door in the middle was not open. We are looking at a manufactured crime scene.

It was an active crime scene. We are looking at the active crime scene. The glass is still on the bricks. The only open doors are on the left. Who opened those doors? The middle door was shut. So who opened the side doors on the left? It looks like the crime scene was tampered with. The break-in was subsequent to the entry.

Then the entry was consensual. The broken glass doors were not the entry point into the house. This is evident from the photos on Friday morning.

Why was Paul Pelosi not in the panic room or safe room if the alarms went off? If there was a breakin then why would Paul Pelosi go downstairs, greet the man, and bring him up to the bedroom?

The story does not add up.

This gets curiouser and curiouser.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

TheSentinel · M

David DePape is the end product of a cross between mental illness, and the hate that is pushed by the far right wing media.
I understand you feel the need to protect your team, but there are bigger concerns here.

1-25 of 30

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@TheSentinel I don't get it. Just say he is a mentally deranged individual, and not right wing. That is fine with most of us, because that is the truth. But to invent a completely different narrative and make this as some kind of false-flag makes your side look MUCH more foolish. I am not sure what is implied by the photo of the door. If I was to break into a house, I would smash the glass, reach in, and unlock and open the door. I would not climb thru the broken window. Are they remarking why is the door closed? Beats me. But I remember a story about a man who had a power line fall down on his car. He carefully opened the door and jumped out without touching the car. But then out of habit he turned around and shut the door and was electrocuted. So a closed door means NOTHING.

TheSentinel · M

@trollslayer I guess you haven't seen his blog then.
Nothing I said was invented. Just fact.
Yes, there can be no doubt about his beliefs.
And I don't have a side.

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@TheSentinel I am just saying right wing media can say "yeah, he posted crazy right wing stuff on his blog. But he is a crazy man and he in no way represents our views." I'd buy that explanation. Jared Loughner attacked Gabby Giffords because he was obsessed with her. His political leanings are irrelevant. Right wing media could make the same excuse here and that is MUCH more plausible than claiming this was a gay sex affair gone wrong.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@trollslayer

more plausible than claiming this was a gay sex affair gone wrong.

Not so fast Troll. Remember Paul is married to Nancy.
It's not inconceivable that someone married to that, might switch teams.
Just sayin,...

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@Budwick LOL. That was actually a funny comment! :)

Budwick · 70-79, M

@trollslayer It's funny cuz it's true!

TheSentinel · M

@trollslayer I wouldn't buy that explanation. All you have to do is read some of the comments from the hard core trump supporters here, or anywhere else where politics is discussed. They're being fed a steady diet of fear and hatred of anyone who holds differing views. And when you add in mental illness, the consequences can be deadly.
Yes, the media bears some responsibility for the recent rise in radicalization we see going on around us., whether left wing or right wing.

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@Budwick By that account Bill Clinton would have a gay lover. But he chose Monica Lewinsky, Gennifer Flowers...I don't know where I am going with this.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@trollslayer

.I don't know where I am going with this.

I don't either.

robb65 · 56-60, M

@TheSentinel There's claims (made by Elon Musk??) that guy's website was created after his arrest. I'm not saying it's true, just that the claim has been made. It should be interesting to see how the guy's statements match up with what the news media has had to say about him.

TheSentinel · M

@robb65 No, not possible. I saw it just shortly after the incident occurred. There is no way it could have been made up that quickly. But it isn't surprising that someone would try to push such a conspiracy.

SW-User

@TheSentinel the BLM and Antifa flags flying from the crapcan in which he was living is proof positive he was a hard right white supremacist, eh?

TheSentinel · M

@SW-User Apparently you didn't see his blog.
And you understand that antifa is an anarchist organization. And what that means is they reject all authority, whether left or right wing.

SW-User

@TheSentinel You mean the entries added the next day when he had no computer access? The ones with the mnemonics indicating that?

Amateurs. Jussie Smollett was more believable

SW-User

@TheSentinel Yeah Antifa is a middle of the road, non ideological rabble. You is smartz.

You know, your age isn't supposed to exceed your IQ

TheSentinel · M

@SW-User Do you really think anarchists are middle of the road? It really sounds like you are in over your head in political discussions if that is really what you think. Actually, I'm embarrassed for you.
So your childish attempt at insulting me because you lack reading comprehension is a complete misfire.

TheSentinel · M

@SW-User Nope, wrong as usual.

This message was deleted by its author.

SW-User

@TheSentinel You said and proved nothing. You are worthless

SatanBurger · 36-40, F

@TheSentinel

All you have to do is read some of the comments from the hard core trump supporters here, or anywhere else where politics is discussed

I've been on youtube right winged videos and all the comments are absolutely toxic, not even about Trump but anything involving the right wing seems very reactionary. The comments under those videos are people who, in real life, I'd think would hurt me because the comments are vitriolic.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@SatanBurger It's really helpful when you post vague accusations. That way you can make it sound like there's something bad going on, when in reality, you never really said anything.

absolutely toxic...
seems very reactionary...
people who would hurt me,
the comments are vitriolic

And not even one example. I call horse feathers!

SatanBurger · 36-40, F

@Budwick

you never really said anything

Anyone that has the neurons necessary for critical thinking can go under right winged reactionary videos to see the toxicity:

https://medium.com/@hmpig.dcc/analyzing-right-wing-youtube-channels-hate-violence-and-discrimination-13c430d8b66b

Not everything has to be a conspiracy but gaslighters gonna gaslight I suppose. I'm literally not hiding anything when you can go under those videos to see the comments.

You want to talk about vague but you spread misinformation all the time. I understand why you do that because after all, what good would recruitment be if you just told the truth and that's not your end goal so it would make no sense for you to be honest, logically.

I am, however, well within my rights to disagree with you on any subject.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@SatanBurger How about that? A website dedicated to reviewing youtube videos with opinions contrary to the 'accepted diatribe'. Did they do a review on my posts? Or, are you generalizing and assuming you can get away with baseless accusations?

SatanBurger · 36-40, F

@Budwick If you don't see the violence of these right winged channels and their rhetoric, their anger, hostility, rage and just flat out denialism, you probably identify on some level with their anger also. A person like that isn't going to up and say "you know what, I am a pretty angry person maybe I should go to therapy because some of the things I feel may be distorted," because often times, it doesn't work like that. It's far more likely that the right wing's victimization is reaping benefits like a dysfunctional supportive family and so there is more incentive for you to be a "victim" of whatever demon you choose for yourself.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@SatanBurger You are kind building up a fantasy story there Coagulation. There are extremists on both sides. To assume that they represent the bulk of the party is a mistake.

The left is represented by the president, the administration, Senators, Congresspeople, the media, social media, you, and a number of others here on SW all singing the same radical tune. So, I think a great deal of what you claim is a right wing issue, is actually a left wing Marxist issue.

1-25 of 30