@LeopoldBloom

What is a stunt? Spending hundreds of millions of dollars each year to care for millions of homeless and jobless new immigrant squatters?

@marke No, a "stunt" is violating Florida law by bringing illegal immigrants to the state from Texas, lying to them to get them on the plane, and making a sweetheart deal with a contractor to pay them six times the going rate for a private flight. It's legal to remove them from Florida; it's not legal to bring them in.

If Florida had an illegal immigrant problem, DeSatan would have been able to find enough of them there to pull his stunt instead of importing them from Texas.

@LeopoldBloom
Democrats praise Biden for secretly spending millions of dollars to fly illegals all over the country at night but the leftist go ape bamamas wild with rage when republicans send immigrants into rich democrat neighborhoods in broad daylight.

@marke Republicans celebrate when white cops murder unarmed Black people, but lose their minds when the FBI collects documents from TFG after he lied about having them.

@LeopoldBloom
Cops who criminally murder unarmed black people are rare. Blacks who murder cops for being cops are not so rare.

Weaponized democrat-friendly justice officials who falsely accuse Trump of crimes and misdemeanors are also not rare.

@marke It's safer to be a cop today than it was when I was growing up. And despite your dismissal of police violence, it's 2 ½ times more likely for a Black person to die at the hands of a cop than it is for a white person. The ratio is even worse for Native Americans, but not noticed as the raw numbers are low due to there being so few of them.

Trump stole documents he wasn't entitled to, was asked to return them, and lied about having them in his possession. If anyone else did that, they'd have been arrested by now. But your orange savior is entitled to due process like anyone else.

Are you people still bleating to "defund the FBI?" Or now you like them again because they might arrest Hunter Biden?

@LeopoldBloom
I suspect it must be 3 or more times more likely for a cop to be assassinated by a black than by a white, but so what?

Leftists accused Trump of colluding with Russia, but they lied. leftists accused Trump of trying to pull a Joe Biden quid-pro-quo stunt with Ukraine, but they lied. And the left is now accusing Trump of stealing documents and they are lying again.

I do believe it is time to purge the FBI of partisan crooks.

@marke You "suspect" because you get all of your news from Tucker Carlson or "Stormfront," but I repeat myself.

Trump is guilty of all those things, but the treasonous Republicans were too scared of potential terrorists like you to hold him accountable. That's not the case today, and his ass is going down for selling our state secrets to our enemies. You don't think he stole those documents to use as dinner napkins, do you?

Don't worry, if the FBI arrests Hunter Biden, you'll be drooling over them again.

@LeopoldBloom

Trump is not guilty of stealing documents and he was not guilty of colluding with Putin to influence the 2016 election and he was not guilty of quid pro quo in Ukraine. Ironically Biden was clearly guilty of quid pro quo in Ukraine and Bill Clinton and his pals were clearly guilty of quid pro quo in the extortion of money from poor American Indians seeking help in the Ft. Reno case.

S. Rept. 105-167 - INVESTIGATION OF ILLEGAL OR IMPROPER ACTIVITIES IN CONNECTION WITH 1996 FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS105th Congress (1997-1998)
Committee Report

The Committee investigated the circumstances surrounding
contributions totaling $107,000 that the Cheyenne and Arapaho
Tribes of Oklahoma (``C/A'' or ``tribes'') made to the DNC in
1996. The bulk of the contributions, approximately $87,000
worth, was made shortly after two C/A representatives attended
a June 17, 1996 luncheon at the White House, where they were
afforded an opportunity to speak to President Clinton about a
long-standing tribal land claim (to the Fort Reno lands in
Oklahoma, described below). On March 13, 1997, following media
accounts that discussed the stark poverty of the tribes and
raised questions about the source of the money used for the
contributions, the DNC returned all of the C/A contributions. ...

Turpen was a crucial fact witness,
a point Committee staff made often to him and his attorney.
According to the tribe, Turpen helped solicit their DNC
contributions and invited them to attend the June 17, 1996
White House luncheon. In one news account, Archie Hoffman, the
tribal secretary, stated, ``Turpen said give $100,000; he said
that's the way you gotta work.'' ...

This chapter in the DNC's 1996 fund-raising efforts
is among the most sordid. In brief, Democratic fund-raisers led
the tribes, who were politically naive, to believe that making
a large contribution would secure them the long-sought Fort
Reno lands. The tribes made contributions to the DNC, received
encouragement about their land claim from many quarters,
including the President himself, but ultimately received
nothing. The tribes then fell into the hands of a series of
Democratic operators, who attempted to pick their pockets for
legal fees, land development fees, and additional
contributions. The fleecing stopped only when several
unflattering press accounts ran regarding the tribes' plight. ...


Throughout this time, Turpen was also a top Oklahoma fund-
raiser for the Democratic Party and Clinton/Gore
'96.8 In early 1996, he first mentioned that the
tribes should get involved in the ``process'' and make a
contribution to the DNC. He told them at least once that in
order for the tribes to be noticed, such a contribution should
be ``six figures.'' Over the course of several weeks in the
spring of 1996, the tribal leaders decided that they should
contribute to the DNC as a means of ``getting heard'' on their
land claim. ...

Several days later, on June 13, 1996, Turpen called
Grellner, telling him words to the effect, ``You have decided
to give $100,000 to the DNC. As a result, you will be invited
to a lunch with President Clinton at the White House on June
17, 1996.'' ...

As the following excerpts from the tapes reveal, it is
clear the tribes believed that their discussion with President
Clinton was made possible only by contributions and that the
discussion with the President would lead to the return of the
land: 21...

Mr. Lenzner told the
Committee that the C/A representatives with whom he met
believed they had been promised favorable action on their land
claim in exchange for contributions to the DNC: ...


Lenzner: They [the tribal representatives] say they
had been approached by somebody who had worked in the
campaign, whose name I can't recall. They had been
promised action on the lands. . . . My recollection is
that they were promised favorable action, that they
were going to get their lands returned in exchange for
a donation.26 ...

In fact, Lenzner, whose firm the DNC had retained to
investigate foreign money contributions, initially thought the
tribal representatives wanted him to investigate the DNC for
the failure to consummate a contributions-for-land quid pro
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
quo:

@marke So lock them up, too. This was over 25 years ago. Shall we talk about your savior Saint Ronald Reagan and the Iran-Contra scandal? That senile old coot should have gone to prison along with Oliver North and the rest of the criminals.

If your point is "Democrats got away with it, therefore Twitler should too," you've proven my point. Trump took documents he had no right to as a private citizen, then lied about having them when asked to return them. So if he's not a criminal, he's clearly too stupid and disorganized to be allowed to hold office again.

@LeopoldBloom
Pay-to-play corruption has been a problem common to human governments of all generations for thousands of years. Election corruption has been a problem in America for over a hundred years. Unjust persecution of political or personal enemies has been a problem in the world for thousands of years. Americans who claim democrats no longer commit such wickedness are blind.

I supported what Reagan and American conservatives were doing to support freedom fighters against the communists in Nicaragua. Reagan officials arranged the sale of arms to Iran in the Iran-contra affair. How can democrats condemn Reagan for that after Obama gave Iran terrorists more than $1 billion in cash they did not deserve in order to build more WMDs to use against Israel and the US?

@LeopoldBloom
There is a history of pay-to-play corruption in DC that has corrupted politics and the judiciary to the point that innocent American patriots are being jailed and leftist democrat crooks go free.

@marke Reagan, Oliver North, and others in that circle were illegally selling arms to Iran to fund the Contras in violation of the Boland Amendment. The CIA was allowing Central American drug dealers to sell crack in the inner cities while Nancy Reagan was telling everyone to "just say no." These were all well documented even if your indoctrination taught you that the Contras were anything more than a bunch of semi-competent death squads. The only reason Reagan escaped impeachment and prison was because he was suffering from advanced Alzheimer's by then and literally may not have remembered what happened. If this had happened under a Democratic administration, you'd be hysterical.

People who break into the Capitol to disrupt Congress in its constitutionally-mandated task of counting the electoral votes aren't "patriots," they're criminals. My only problem with this is that the people on the bottom are going to jail while the instigators are still walking free. Maybe that will change.

@LeopoldBloom
Reagan supported the Iran Contra affair for the good that would come of it, not for the bad. Biden and Obama also violated immigration and voting laws because they imagined their violations of the law would do more good than harm.

The Iran-Contra affair (article) | Khan Academy
[b][b][b]Overview
• In the Iran-Contra affair, the Reagan administration secretly sold weapons to Iran to effect the release of American hostages held in Lebanon.
• Money from the Iran weapons-sale then was used to fund the Contras, a group of guerrilla “freedom fighters” opposed to the Marxist government of Nicaragua.
• Both the sale of arms to Iran and the military aid to the Contras were illegal, and Colonel Oliver North and others in the president’s administration were dismissed and charged with breaking the law.
[/b][/b][/b]

@marke Reagan's support for Iran-Contra was based on the disproven "domino theory." We'd already seen that Vietnam turning communist didn't cause every other country in southeast Asia to turn communist. And the Contras were nothing more than incompetent, drug-dealing death squads, not the equivalent of the founding fathers as Reagan called them. But at least you admit that the program was illegal. As president, Reagan should also have been charged and served time in prison; the only reason he got off was because he "didn't recall" anything, which at that point may have been true. It's hilarious how conservatives are saying Biden is senile when Saint Ronald was almost completely debilitated by that point in his presidency.

@LeopoldBloom
In America the term "illegal" is relative, not concrete. Democrats do not obey laws banning federal support for Planned Parenthood and abortion. Democrats do not obey immigration laws. Democrats do not obey election laws. And so forth.

@marke Actually, you're incorrect. Planned Parenthood has been audited repeatedly (including in Indiana when the hysterically anti-abortion governor Mike Pence was in charge) and has never been found in violation. The rest of your accusations are just BS you picked up on Hannity. If Democrats were violating the law, why didn't your orange savior do something about it instead of sitting around with his thumb up his butt?

If you don't think the president has to follow laws passed by Congress, you should move to North Korea or Saudi Arabia where the supreme leader doesn't have to answer to anyone. In the U.S., the president is subject to the law like everyone else.

@LeopoldBloom
Neither Obama nor Biden obeyed federal voting laws and immigration laws and Hillary Clinton openly disregarded federal laws protecting the handling of classified material.

@LeopoldBloom
If blacks commit 3 times more assaults on cops than do whites then for blacks to die at 2.5 times more than whites is not unusual.


Trump is accused by lying leftist enemies of God and America of committing treason against the democrat party. I don't give a flip about the scoundrels and their hateful opposition to Trump and conservative Christian American patriots.


The corrupt cops in the FBI need to be removed for the good of America and its people.

@LeopoldBloom
If the special counsel is not allowed to review the documents and KTB does not have access to leak them to the public, then we have Trump's word against the word of lying, leftist, hateful, radical, Hillary-loving, Trump-hating, crooks. I don't believe the proven liars.

@marke Trump has lied over 30,000 times but he’s still not a proven liar to you. Even his lawyers are lawyering up.

@LeopoldBloom
Democrats broadcast their support for open borders contrary to US immigration law and then condemn DeSantis for moving the immigrants around once they get here. What a moronic mob the democrats have evolved to be.

@marke Please provide a quote from a prominent Democratic politician saying they want "open borders." How about I accuse Republicans of wanting to use immigrants for target practice and sex slavery?

DeSatan couldn't find enough illegal immigrants in Florida to pull his stunt, so he flew some from Texas and had them touch down in Florida briefly before flying them to Martha's Vineyard. He's in trouble because while flying them out of Florida isn't a crime, flying them in to Florida amounts to kidnapping or even human trafficking. He's also in trouble for blowing $600K on a flight that would cost no more than $100K if you or I chartered it. So much for "fiscal responsibility."

The proof that DeSatan knows he screwed up is that he planned another flight to Joe Biden's home in Delaware, but called it off after the allegations of criminality and misuse of public funds came out. Of course, you worship DeSatan as the next Trump, so he can do no wrong in your eyes. It's pathetic how conservatives are compelled to worship the worst politicians in America because they're incapable of independent thought.

@LeopoldBloom


The democrat Gestapo raid on Trump's home was totally illegal. Democrats were after documents Trump was using in his case against Hillary and others who invented the Trump/Russian collusion conspiracy theory lie. Every American has constitutional protections against illegal search and seizures, but the democrats trampled Trump's right in their illegal Mar-a-Lago raid.


Probable Cause Requirement | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)

Amdt4.3.2.2.1.3 Particularity Requirement
Fourth Amendment:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
“The requirement that warrants shall particularly describe the things to be seized makes general searches under them impossible and prevents the seizure of one thing under a warrant describing another. As to what is to be taken, nothing is left to the discretion of the officer executing the warrant.” 1

This requirement thus acts to limit the scope of the search, as the executing officers should be limited to looking in places where the described object could be expected to be found.2 The purpose of the particularity requirement extends beyond prevention of general searches; it also assures the person whose property is being searched of the lawful authority of the executing officer and of the limits of his power to search. It follows, therefore, that the warrant itself must describe with particularity the items to be seized, or that such itemization must appear in documents incorporated by reference in the warrant and actually shown to the person whose property is to be searched.3 (because the language of the Fourth Amendment “specifies only two matters that must be 'particularly describ[ed]' in the warrant: 'the place to be searched' and 'the persons or things to be seized[,]' . . .

@LeopoldBloom
Democrats lie about Mar-a-Lago just like they lie about so many other things. They issued an illegal search warrant that supposedly allowed agents to seize anything and everything they saw in Trump's home and that kind of search is totally illegal, even if stupid Americans don't understand that fact of the law.

FBI Mar-a-Lago Warrant Had ‘No Legal Basis’: Constitutional Lawyers (theepochtimes.com)

Two constitutional lawyers who worked in the Bush and Reagan administrations say that the warrant used to search former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence had no legal basis.
A former president’s right under the Presidential Records Act supersedes the statutes the Department of Justice and FBI used to carry out the raid earlier this month, wrote David Rivkin Jr. and Lee Casey, who both served under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush.

“The judge who issued the warrant for Mar-a-Lago has signaled that he is likely to release a redacted version of the affidavit supporting it. But the warrant itself suggests the answer is likely no—the FBI had no legally valid cause for the raid,” they wrote in the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday.

Earlier this month, federal Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart unsealed the warrant and property receipt, showing that it allowed FBI agents to obtain all “physical documents and records constituting evidence, contraband, fruits of crime, or other items illegally possessed in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§793, 2071, or 1519.”

And the materials that could be seized are “any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017, and January 20, 2021,” which encompasses all of Trump’s presidential term.
As a result, the two scholars said that “virtually all the materials at Mar-a-Lago are likely to fall within this category” but “federal law gives Mr. Trump a right of access to them.”

“His possession of them is entirely consistent with that right, and therefore lawful, regardless of the statutes the FBI cites in its warrant,” Rivkin and Casey wrote.