I want women voting. Despite my utter contempt for TERFS I am VERY Strongly against Paul Elam the MRA, the MGTOW.

I don't see things the way elam (As in Paul Elam) did at all
I needed help myself from the government and am trying to break that need because I'm well aware of the trust fund and it's solvency issues that are coming up the pike and unlikely to be resolved because republican voters would have to die off far quicker for it to really get fixed.
I mean it's a terrible thing to say but it happens to strictly speaking be true.
but the thing is that elam and the others gave us this whole notion their whole slogan was like women want equal rights but right.s mean responsibilities and they don't have any and it's just I'm such a computer guy as it is already that I know what variables are and abstract thinking and how organizations like the satanic temple in a way were only trying t o take advatange of the law to make the religious right have to rethink what they were doing to our nations laws by makign them result in all kinds of things they had never intended them to do and it's like Elam might not intend per his words for his argument that rights ought to have associated responsibilites to be used against men but it's too easy to foresee his own arguments being repackaged and used in a way that damages us as a cohort.
let me demonstrate: Women want equal rights but they don't want equal responsibiliteis
Certain men want equal rights, but they don't want equal responsibilities.
X want equal rights but they don't want equal responsibiliteis.
You can put anything in the X position.
now it's just a formula.
and it's easy to show that some men don't want the same responsibilites not every man is a TAX PAYER in our society and yet all men CAN vote provided they're registered.
some men don't work the same jobs as others For years IWas just a ward of the state I didn't even have my own company as I do now so all I did was siphon off taxpayer money and yet still could vote
and that's just it how long before some chud comes along and figures out that they could suggest linking Military Service to the right to vote and say only people who had served should have the civil liberty that is the right to vote?
once you take women's rights to vote away it becomes a lot easier to start thinknig about taking still entire other groups of peoples rights away and it becomes a spiral that will not end until only the smallest sliver of society has rights.
and so I say yes women should have the right to vote even if they dont have the same responsibilites as taxpaying men.

I've learned my history well:

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
—Martin Niemöller

its what the assholes in power fear- unity.

Solidarity women of the world

The point here is that Paul Elam has not thought about the Fire he is playing with Deeply enough. if you use his logic it won't be long before someone comes along and publically declares you should have to earn the right to vote by spending two years serving in the military.

Once you start down the road of taking certain parties rights away it's a very very slippery slope.